Complete Revascularization after Pharmacoinvasive Strategy

Patients initially receiving pharmacoinvasive strategy for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) also presenting multivessel disease consistently benefit from complete revascularization. This benefit is similar to that of primary PCI.  

Revascularización completa luego de estrategia fármaco invasiva

The COMPLETE showed that staged non-culprit lesion percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduced major cardiovascular events in STEMI patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. This benefit was not clear for patients initially receiving antithrombotic medication not being able to access PCI right away. 

Following successful culprit lesion PCI, STEMI 4041 patients with multivessel disease were randomized to either routine non-culprit lesion PCI or culprit lesion only PCI. 

In a COMPLETE prespecified analysis, effect in 303 patients undergoing a pharmacoinvasive strategy was determined against 3738 patients undergoing primary PCI. Two primary end points were defined: on the one hand, cardiovascular death or new myocardial infarction and on the other hand, cardiovascular death, new myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization. 

The first primary end point was reduced with complete revascularization both in the patients undergoing a pharmacoinvasive strategy (2.1% vs 4.7%, HR 0.45, 95% CI, 0.21–0.97) and in patients undergoing primary PCI (2.7% vs 3.6%, HR 0.77, 95% CI, 0.62–0.95; interaction P=0.18). 


Read also: SOLACI PERIPHERAL | Type Ib Endoleak Correction in Patient After Minimally Invasive Hybrid Treatment in Type A Aortic Disection.


The second primary end point was also reduced significantly with complete revascularization in patients undergoing an initial pharmacoinvasive strategy and in patients undergoing primary PCI.

Conclusion

Patients with multivessel disease with STEMI benefit from complete revascularization after treating the culprit lesion both with primary PCI and initial pharmacoinvasive strategy. 

Orignal Title: Complete Revascularization in Patients Undergoing a Pharmacoinvasive Strategy for ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the COMPLETE Trial.

Reference: Payam Dehghani et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Aug;14(8):e010458. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.010458.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

ACC 2025 | FLAVOUR II: Angiography-Derived FFR-Guided vs. IVUS-Guided PCI

Physiological assessment is effective when it comes to decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite the available evidence, its use remains limited. AngioFFR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...