Non-Culprit Vessel Angioplasty in the Elderly: Choosing the Right Cases Is Important

This large analysis found no benefit at a 1-year follow-up to angioplasty of non-culprit vessels in elderly patients admitted with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Angioplastia a vasos no culpables en añosos: la necesidad de elegir bien los casos

The COMPLETE study was presented at the European Society of Cardiology 2019 Congress (and simultaneously published in NEJM) with evidence that seemed to leave no doubt regarding this issue. However, new research and sub-studies from the COMPLETE study conducted in the last two years have dimmed such certainty.

This research analyzed all patients >65 years old with multivessel disease admitted with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction between 2009 and 2017. All procedures performed on other vessels within 45 days of infarction were defined as “non-culprit vessel angioplasty.”

The primary endpoint was a composite of death, infarction, and revascularization conducted between 45 days and a year after infarction.

About 56,332 patients were admitted to 1102 institutions. Of all patients, 37.7% underwent angioplasty in other vessels within 4 days of the index angioplasty for the infarction.

In a first analysis of raw data, complete revascularization was superior, but this effect was diluted after adjusting for multiple confounding variables.

Ultimately, non-culprit vessel angioplasty did not show a significant difference compared with primary angioplasty alone (p = 0.46) in this population >65 years.


Read also: ESC 2021 | Updated European Society of Cardiology Guidelines for the Management of Valvular Heart Disease.


Despite the multiple statistical adjustments made by the authors, this analysis is not without weaknesses (complete revascularization was left to operator’s discretion, the 45-day cut-off is arbitrary, among others).

Conclusion

In this large analysis with over 50,000 patients, no benefit could be found in performing multivessel angioplasty in elderly patients admitted with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The benefit observed in large randomized studies may not be transferable to older patients and more complex decisions.

Original Title: Comparative Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: An National Cardiovascular Data Registry Research to Practice Project.

Reference: Eric A Secemsky et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Aug;14(8):e010323. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.010323.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...

Dual-Prep Registry: Atherectomy and IVL for Severe Coronary Calcification

Severe coronary calcification remains one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although rotational or orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)...

Prehospital heparin in STEMI: A safe strategy associated with improved early reperfusion

Early reperfusion remains the main prognostic determinant in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment...

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...