STOPDAPT-2 ACS: One-Month DAPT NOT Enough in acute patients

One-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients undergoing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) did not reach the safety and efficacy results observed in the general population of the original trial STOPDAPT-2.

STOPDAPT-2 ACS: Un mes de DAPT NO es suficiente en pacientes agudos

The STOPDAPT-2 ACS compared one-month DAPT followed by clopidogrel monotherapy for one year vs. one-year DAPT after PCI. 

Initially, the study enrolled mostly stable patients (38% acute), all receiving the everolimus eluting Xience.

Upon analysis, stable patients (STOPDAPT-2) showed both non-inferiority and superiority of one-month vs 12-month DAPT for the primary efficacy end point of cardiovascular death, MI, stroke, definite thrombosis, and bleeding. This was not the case for ACS patients. 

For the same combined end point, in acute patients the accumulated events rate was 3.2% for those in the one-month DAPT group vs 2.83% for patients in the 12-month DAPT (HR 1.15; CI 95% 0.80 to 1.62): not significant.

However, looking at bleeding separately (both major and minor) these resulted significantly lower in the one-month DAPT group (0.54% vs 1.17%, HR 0.46; CI 95% 0.23 to 0.94). MI rates were also different, nearly twice as high for patients in the one-month group. (1.59% vs 0.85%, HR 1.91; CI 95% 1.06 to 3.44).


Read also: The FDA Approves a Third Device in the TAVR Race.


Outcomes from the STOPDAPT-2 ACS have raised some questions. Most physicians will most likely rule out clopidogrel in ACS patients at high ischemic risk. 

We should also take into account bleeding risk. During the same ESC 2021 the MASTER DAPT was presented; it tested one-month DAPT followed by clopidogrel monotherapy in patients at high risk of bleeding (one third of the population were enrolled while undergoing ACS). 

MASTER DAPT outcomes were positive in favor of one-month DAPT, and this advantage came hand in hand with reduced bleeding, which maintained safety in ischemic events. 

Original Title: STOPDAPT-2 ACS: one-month dual antiplatelet therapy followed by clopidogrel monotherapy in acute coronary syndrome.

Reference: Watanabe H. et al. Presentado en el ESC 2021.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Drugs for the Treatment of No-Reflow During PCI

The no-reflow phenomenon is one of the most frustrating complications of primary angioplasty (pPCI), reflecting persistent microvascular damage that, in the mid- to long-term,...

Rotational atherectomy and its technical secrets: use of floppy or ES guidewire

Rotational atherectomy (RA) remains a very useful tool in the management of severe coronary calcification. However, many of its technical aspects rely more on...

CRT 2026 | CUT-DRESS Trial: Lesion Preparation with Cutting Balloon

In-stent restenosis (ISR) continues to represent a relevant clinical challenge in contemporary coronary angioplasty practice. Despite advances in drug-eluting stents, neointimal hyperplasia and suboptimal...

CRT 2026 | Clopidogrel vs Aspirin as Long-Term Monotherapy After Coronary Angioplasty

The use of aspirin as chronic antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has historically been the standard recommended by international guidelines. However, recent...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Drugs for the Treatment of No-Reflow During PCI

The no-reflow phenomenon is one of the most frustrating complications of primary angioplasty (pPCI), reflecting persistent microvascular damage that, in the mid- to long-term,...

Coronary revascularization before TAVI: prior PCI or conservative management?

The coexistence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI is common, with a reported prevalence ranging from 30%...

Rotational atherectomy and its technical secrets: use of floppy or ES guidewire

Rotational atherectomy (RA) remains a very useful tool in the management of severe coronary calcification. However, many of its technical aspects rely more on...