More Screening Needed Before Non-Cardiac Surgery

According to this recent document by the American Heart Association (AHA), troponin should be monitored for at least 3 days after surgery.

Más screening es necesario previo a una cirugía cardíaca

With about 20% of patients (most of them, asymptomatic) showing elevated troponin after a non-cardiac surgery, this new AHA document recommends monitoring, for at least two days, patients with moderate to severe ischemia.

Myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery was first associated with increased mortality in 2014. At the time, researchers interpreted that these events could be triggered by an increased burden of risk factors, including patients over 75 years of age with sleep apnea, anemia, cardiac failure, diabetes, and hypertension.

The moral of this work would be that myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery is frequent, silent, and fatal—so it should be taken into account.

Current evidence shows that patients who develop injury have four times higher 30-day mortality, and about 90% of this population has no identifiable symptoms.

Given that most subjects develop symptoms within 24 hours, the document suggests dosing troponins for 48 to 72 hours in patients at moderately high risk.


Read also: Hypertensive Patients: Maximizing Doses or Adding New Drugs.


The idea of performing ischemia-evoking tests prior to non-cardiac surgery left us without much to do if a patient with normal results developed an injury. Now we can comprehend the elevation and re-stratify patients, reducing their future risk.

Post-surgical injury should end in a direct referral to a cardiologist to evaluate the indication for aspirin and lifestyle changes. Patient could interpret this as secondary prevention.

CIR-0000000000001024

Original Title: Diagnosis and management of patients with myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

Reference: Kurt Ruetzler et al. Circulation. 2021 Oct 4;CIR0000000000001024. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001024. 


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

ACC 2025 | FLAVOUR II: Angiography-Derived FFR-Guided vs. IVUS-Guided PCI

Physiological assessment is effective when it comes to decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite the available evidence, its use remains limited. AngioFFR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...