Prosthesis-Annular Size Ratio and Its Impact on Leaks

In low-risk patients, there was a very low incidence of greater than moderate leak, including in patients with minimal oversizing.

Tamaño de la prótesis con respecto al anillo y su impacto en los leaks

The degree of prosthesis oversizing had a great impact on mild paravalvular leak reduction and the need for post-dilation without changing valve hemodynamics.

This research investigated the impact of the perimeter and the area, measured by tomography, and the valve size chosen on the incidence of paravalvular leak in patients treated with a Sapien 3 prosthesis.

The PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves 3) study included 495 low surgical risk patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Prosthesis sizing was based on annulus area, as measured by tomography.

Oversizing was 7.9 ± 8.7% for the annulus and 2.1 ± 4.1% for the perimeter. The incidence of leak greater than moderate was very low (0.6%).

The incidence of patients with leak greater than mild who required post-dilation was inversely proportional to the degree of oversizing.

In patients with intermediate measurements—who could therefore receive larger or smaller valves—, larger valves had a lower incidence of leak (12.0% vs. 43.4%; p < 0.0001).


Read also: 3rd Generation Valves in Large and X-Large Annuli.


Prosthesis size (rather than the degree of oversizing) impacted the effective orifice and gradients.

Conclusion

In patients who were candidates to two valvular measures because of their annulus, choosing the larger measure reduces the incidence of leak and improves their hemodynamic profile.

Original Title: Impact of Annular Oversizing on Paravalvular Regurgitation and Valve Hemodynamics: New Insights From PARTNER 3.

Reference: Abdul Rahman Ihdayhid et al. JACC Cardiovasc Inter. 2021 Oct 11;14(19):2158-2169. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.07.018.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Percutaneous Tricuspid Valve Replacement with Lux-Valve

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a condition associated with poor quality of life, frequent hospitalizations due to heart failure, and increased mortality, even under optimal...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

ACC 2025 | TAVI in Low-Risk Patients: 5-Year Outcomes of EVOLUTE LOW RISK

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one of its main limitations...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...