HYDRA CE | New Models for TAVR Development

The Hydra CE has shown favorable one year efficacy for the new transcatheter aortic valve model, with large effective orifice and low transvalvular gradient associated to an acceptable complications rate.  With this study, the Hydra will obtain the CE mark and go after FDA approval (just as all new devices). 

HYDRA CE | Surgen nuevos modelos con los que avanza el TAVI

This study looked at safety and performance of the new Hydra valve to treat severe aortic stenosis in high or extreme surgical risk patients. 

Hydra presents a repositionable self-expanding system with supra-annular bovine pericardial leaflets. This emulates the big majority of self-expanding models currently available, as well as those to come.  

The study included 157 patients (79.2 ± 7.1 mean age and 4.7 ± 3.4% STS) with 94.3% successful implantation.

At 30 días, mortality was 7%, including 5.7% cardiovascular deaths; 3.2% were device related.

There was significant improvement of effective orifice area (from 0.7 ± 0.2 cm2 to 1.9 ± 0.6 cm2) and mean aortic valve gradient (from 49.5 ± 18.5 mm Hg to 8.1 ± 3.7 mm Hg). These figures were maintained for a year. 


Read also: Is the Booster Dose Against COVID-19 Effective for All Ages?


Moderate to severe paravalvular leak was observed in 6.3% of patients at 30 days and in 6.9% 1 year. This differs from the observed trend of the rest of self-expanding valves, which tend to show leak improvement at one year. 

Pacemaker implantation rate was 11.7% at 30 days and 12.4% at one year.

Conclusion

This study aiming at obtaining the CE mark, has shown favorable efficacy for the new Hydra, with excellent hemodynamic results and acceptable complications rate. 

Original Title: 30-Day and 1-Year Outcomes With HYDRA Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve: The Hydra CE Study.

Reference: Audrius Aidietis et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan 10;15(1):93-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.09.004.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Transradial Aortic Valvuloplasty: Is Minimalism Worth It?

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has historically been used either as a bridge strategy, an assessment tool, or even palliative treatment in severe aortic stenosis...

Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Cohort Study with Continuous Implantable Cardiac Monitoring

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a recognized complication following percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO), with reported incidences of up to 30% during...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....