Acute Coronary Syndrome: What Is Safer, Antiaggregant Monotherapy or De-Escalation?

For several years it has been shown that 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is mandatory for patients undergoing left main PCI for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, though this strategy does reduce thrombotic events and mortality, it also causes undesirable bleeding events followed by hospitalization and antiaggregation interruption for a period of time. 

Síndromes coronarios agudos: ¿Qué es más seguro: monoterapia con antiagregante o De-Escalation?

A feasible strategy could be to interrupt one of the antiaggregants (be it aspirin -ASA- or P2Y12 inhibitor). The alternative could be to switch (De-Escalation) to a P2Y12 inhibitor of lower antiaggregation power (for example from prasugrel or ticagrelor to clopidogrel) or to reduce dosage.

This question remains unanswered.

This meta-analysis included 29 studies with 50602 patients, and it compared short duration antiaggregation (SHORT DAPT) vs. de-escalation.

Mean age was 63, there was an important number of women and a percentage of diabetics that ranged between 22% and 26%. There were no differences in all-cause mortality. 

De-escalation reduced the risk of net adverse cardiovascular events (NACE) (RR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.70-0.94) but increased the risk of major bleeding (RR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.07-2.21).

Read also: IVUS in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A New Requirement?

De-Escalation showed >95% probability to prevent NACE, MI, stroke, stent-thrombosis, and minor bleeding. However, it showed a very high rate of major bleeding. 

On the other hand, the SHORT DAPT approach showed better performance (>95%) in the prevention of major bleeding.

Conclusion

In patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing PCI there were no differences in all-cause mortality between SHORT DAPT and De-Escalation. De-Escalation reduced NACE risk, while SHORT DAPT reduced the risk of major bleeding. 

These data characterize 2 contemporary strategies to personalize the use of DAPT according to treatment goals and risk profile.

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the SOLACI.org Editorial Board. 

Original Title: Short Duration of DAPT Versus De-Escalation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndromes.

Reference: Claudio Laudani, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2022;15:268–277.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

Comparison of strategies: NMA of IVUS, OCT, or angiography in complex lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions continues to represent a technical challenge in contemporary interventional cardiology. Angiography, although it remains the most widely...

Dynamic Coronary Roadmap: does it really help reduce contrast use?

Contrast-induced nephropathy remains a relevant complication of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), particularly in patients with multiple comorbidities and complex coronary anatomies. Dynamic Coronary Roadmap...

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TEER plus optimal medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in functional mitral regurgitation

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a highly prevalent valvular heart disease that, in advanced stages and when left untreated, is associated with reduced quality of...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

VECTOR: First Percutaneous Aorto-Coronary Bypass Case, a New Conceptual Approach

Coronary obstruction represents one of the most severe complications associated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation, particularly in valve-in-valve scenarios involving surgical bioprostheses, narrow aortic...