Is Coronary Revascularization Useful in Renal Transplant Candidates?

Coronary artery disease is the main cause of death in patients with functioning renal transplant, reaching 30%, with the highest rate at peri transplant stage. At the same time, the incidence of acute myocardial infraction (AMI) after renal transplant ranges from 5% to 11%. This is why asymptomatic candidates are routinely screened for CAD before transplant. 

¿Es útil la revascularización coronaria en pacientes candidatos a trasplante renal?

The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness of coronary revascularization vs optimal medical treatment before transplant. 

Primary end point was all cause mortality. 

8 studies were looked at, including 945 patients in total. 35.9% were women, mean age 56. Five studies reported total mortality. 

There were no significant differences (RR 1.16 [95% CI, 0.63-2.12] in primary end point. Four studies reported cardiovascular mortality, also with no significant differences. (RR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.29–1.89]). 

Read also: Ticagrelor Monotherapy after 3 Months: Is the Current Strategy Worth Changing?

Finally , 6 studies reported major cardiovascular events with the same result (RR,0.78 [95% CI, 0.30–2.07]).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis showed coronary revascularization is not superior to optimal medical treatment when it comes to reducing total mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and cardiovascular events in renal transplant candidates

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org

Original Title: Coronary Revascularization Versus Optimal Medical Therapy in Renal Transplant Candidates With Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Reference: Muhammad U. Siddiqui, J Am Heart Assoc. 2022; 11:e023548.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....