Is Coronary Revascularization Useful in Renal Transplant Candidates?

Coronary artery disease is the main cause of death in patients with functioning renal transplant, reaching 30%, with the highest rate at peri transplant stage. At the same time, the incidence of acute myocardial infraction (AMI) after renal transplant ranges from 5% to 11%. This is why asymptomatic candidates are routinely screened for CAD before transplant. 

¿Es útil la revascularización coronaria en pacientes candidatos a trasplante renal?

The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness of coronary revascularization vs optimal medical treatment before transplant. 

Primary end point was all cause mortality. 

8 studies were looked at, including 945 patients in total. 35.9% were women, mean age 56. Five studies reported total mortality. 

There were no significant differences (RR 1.16 [95% CI, 0.63-2.12] in primary end point. Four studies reported cardiovascular mortality, also with no significant differences. (RR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.29–1.89]). 

Read also: Ticagrelor Monotherapy after 3 Months: Is the Current Strategy Worth Changing?

Finally , 6 studies reported major cardiovascular events with the same result (RR,0.78 [95% CI, 0.30–2.07]).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis showed coronary revascularization is not superior to optimal medical treatment when it comes to reducing total mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and cardiovascular events in renal transplant candidates

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org

Original Title: Coronary Revascularization Versus Optimal Medical Therapy in Renal Transplant Candidates With Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Reference: Muhammad U. Siddiqui, J Am Heart Assoc. 2022; 11:e023548.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: CABG + SAVR vs. TAVR + PCI: Data from Spanish Centers

Multiple randomized studies have shown comparable or superior efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).  However, many of...

Evolution of Small Balloon-Expandable Valves

Small aortic rings (20 mm) have posed a significant challenge for both surgery and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) due to their association with an...

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 – ECLIPSE: Randomized Study of Orbital Atherectomy vs Conventional PCI in Severely Calcified Lesions

Coronary calcification is associated with stent under-expansion and increased risk of both early and late adverse events. Atherectomy is an essential tool for uncrossable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation: Surgical vs. Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair

While highly prevalent, tricuspid regurgitation is a notably undertreated valvulopathy. Its progression has been associated with higher mortality and significant disability. According to the...

ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Post TAVR Vascular Closure Devices

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a well-established option to treat elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Technical advances and device development...

Endovascular Treatment of Iliofemoral Disease for the Improvement of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a significant risk factor in the development of difficult-to-treat conditions, such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)....