EuroPCR 2022 | Changes in Cardiac Damage after Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

This study presented at EuroPCR 2022 analyzed the PARTNER study pool and included 1974 patients with a complete echocardiogram.

EuroPCR 2022 | Cambios en el daño cardíaco luego del reemplazo valvular aórtico  por cirugía

Surgical risk was 17.3% extreme/inoperable, 54.3% intermediate and 28.4% low.

60% received transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and the rest surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). 

6.1% of patients were in stage 0 (no damage), 14.5% were in stage 1 (left ventricular damage), 51.4% in study 2 (mitral or left ventricular damage), 20.9% in stage 3 (pulmonary vascular or tricuspid damage) and 7.1% were in stage 4 (right ventricular damage).

Baseline damage was associated with mortality at 2 years with both strategies, as was the composite of death and rehospitalization for cardiac failure. This was maintained after adjusting for variables at one-year followup. 

Cardiac damage remained unchanged in 60% of patients and worsen in 25%. 

At 2 years, morality for stages 0, 1, 2 ,3 and 4 was 2.5%, 7.1%, 14.6%, 28,2% and 28.2% respectively; and for mortality and rehospitalization for cardiac failure, it was 4.1% (stage 0), 13.4% (stage 1), 22.9% (stage 2), 38.7% (stage 3) and 39% (stage 4).

Read also: Should Total Occlusion Influence on Revascularization Strategy?

Improved myocardial damage was associated with lower mortality and rehospitalization for cardiac failure, and worse myocardial damage increased these events. 

Independent predictors of stage worsening were hypertension (OR 1.73; 95% CI 1.01-2.96) and SAVR (OR 2.04; 95% CI 1.52-2.74).

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Source: TCTmd.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...

Cardiac Remodeling After Percutaneous ASD Closure: Should It Be Immediate or Progressive?

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common congenital heart disease that generates a left-to-right shunt, leading to right-side chamber overload and a risk of...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...