Using Biolimus-Coated Balloons for Treating Small-Vessel Disease Yields Promising Results

Drug-eluting balloons have demonstrated safety and effectiveness in the treatment of small-vessel coronary artery disease and in-stent restenosis. However, randomized studies were performed using paclitaxel.

Resultados alentadores de los balones cubiertos de Biolimus para el tratamiento de vasos pequeños

Several studies have shown that using biolimus, a semisynthetic analog of sirolimus, optimizes drug delivery in both stents and balloons.

The aim of this randomized, multicenter study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the biolimus-coated balloon (BCB) in patients with small-vessel coronary artery disease (reference vessel diameter 2.0 to 2.75 mm and length ≤25 mm) undergoing coronary angioplasty.

The primary endpoint (PEP) was vessel lumen narrowing at 9 months as measured by angiography. The secondary endpoint (SEP) included restenosis, and procedural, lesion, and device success.

Clinical outcomes were evaluated up to a 1-year follow-up and included cardiovascular death, treated-vessel-related acute myocardial infarction, clinically guided revascularization, and treated-vessel failure, among others.

A total of 212 patients were included and randomized as follows: 106 to the BCB group and 103 to the balloon angioplasty group; the remaining 3 were excluded because they did not receive the device.

Read also: Should We Start Thinking Again About Bioresorbable Stents?

Mean patient age was 61 years old, and 30% of subjects were female. The most frequent clinical presentation was unstable angina. The number of lesions treated in >95% of patients was 1. Pre-dilation was achieved in all cases and the number of pre-dilations in most patients was 1.

For the PEP, BCB was superior to balloon angioplasty (p = 0.001). The restenosis rate was lower in the BCB group, with 9.9% vs. 28% in the balloon group (p = 0.001). There were no differences in the SEP nor in clinical events at 1 year.

Conclusion

This randomized study has demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the new biolimus-coated balloon in patients with small-vessel coronary artery disease. Positive vascular remodeling was 3 times more frequent when using these devices, and there was a non-significant trend in clinical improvement at 1 year.

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Biolimus-Coated Balloon in Small-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease The BIO-RISE CHINA Study.

Reference: Kai Xu, MD et al J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2022.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....