Using Biolimus-Coated Balloons for Treating Small-Vessel Disease Yields Promising Results

Drug-eluting balloons have demonstrated safety and effectiveness in the treatment of small-vessel coronary artery disease and in-stent restenosis. However, randomized studies were performed using paclitaxel.

Resultados alentadores de los balones cubiertos de Biolimus para el tratamiento de vasos pequeños

Several studies have shown that using biolimus, a semisynthetic analog of sirolimus, optimizes drug delivery in both stents and balloons.

The aim of this randomized, multicenter study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the biolimus-coated balloon (BCB) in patients with small-vessel coronary artery disease (reference vessel diameter 2.0 to 2.75 mm and length ≤25 mm) undergoing coronary angioplasty.

The primary endpoint (PEP) was vessel lumen narrowing at 9 months as measured by angiography. The secondary endpoint (SEP) included restenosis, and procedural, lesion, and device success.

Clinical outcomes were evaluated up to a 1-year follow-up and included cardiovascular death, treated-vessel-related acute myocardial infarction, clinically guided revascularization, and treated-vessel failure, among others.

A total of 212 patients were included and randomized as follows: 106 to the BCB group and 103 to the balloon angioplasty group; the remaining 3 were excluded because they did not receive the device.

Read also: Should We Start Thinking Again About Bioresorbable Stents?

Mean patient age was 61 years old, and 30% of subjects were female. The most frequent clinical presentation was unstable angina. The number of lesions treated in >95% of patients was 1. Pre-dilation was achieved in all cases and the number of pre-dilations in most patients was 1.

For the PEP, BCB was superior to balloon angioplasty (p = 0.001). The restenosis rate was lower in the BCB group, with 9.9% vs. 28% in the balloon group (p = 0.001). There were no differences in the SEP nor in clinical events at 1 year.

Conclusion

This randomized study has demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the new biolimus-coated balloon in patients with small-vessel coronary artery disease. Positive vascular remodeling was 3 times more frequent when using these devices, and there was a non-significant trend in clinical improvement at 1 year.

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Biolimus-Coated Balloon in Small-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease The BIO-RISE CHINA Study.

Reference: Kai Xu, MD et al J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2022.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...

Dual-Prep Registry: Atherectomy and IVL for Severe Coronary Calcification

Severe coronary calcification remains one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although rotational or orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)...

Prehospital heparin in STEMI: A safe strategy associated with improved early reperfusion

Early reperfusion remains the main prognostic determinant in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment...

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...