Three-Year Outcomes after CTA with 2-Stent Technique Vs. Provisional Stenting for Complex Bifurcation Lesions

The prevalence of coronary lesions with bifurcation involvement is about 20% in patients undergoing coronary angiography (CTA). While provisional stenting is overall the most accepted technique, the 2018 myocardial revascularization guidelines recommend the 2-stent technique for complex bifurcation lesions, defined as side branch with lesion >5mm, distal reference diameter of the side branch ≥2.75, or difficulty in accessing the side branch prior stent implantation in the main vessel. 

Resultado a 3 años luego de ATC con técnica de 2- stents vs Provisional stent por bifurcaciones complejas

Prospective, multicenter, randomized study DEFINITION II reported a significant improvement in clinical outcomes after one year using the 2-stent technique in patients with complex coronary bifurcation lesions. However, there is no long-term information on the benefit of these techniques.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 3-year follow-up clinical outcomes after the 2-stent technique vs. provisional stenting.

The primary endpoint (PEP) was treated lesion failure (TLF), which included cardiovascular death, treated-vessel-related acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and clinically driven repeat vascularization of the treated vessel (TVF). The safety endpoint was stent thrombosis.

The study enrolled 635 patients, 328 in the 2-stent arm and 325 in the provisional stenting (PS) arm. Mean patient age was 63 years old, and most subjects were male. Of all patients, 34% had diabetes, and the most frequent clinical presentation was unstable angina. 

In the PS arm, 22% of patients needed a side branch stent due to suboptimal outcomes. Furthermore, side branch pre-treatment increased the need for additional stent use in the PS arm (32% vs. 14%, p < 0,001). There were no differences between arms in POT and kissing balloon use. The intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) use rate was 27%.

Read also: Same Day Discharge in NSTE-ACS: Is It Possible?

The 3-year PEP was 16% in the PS arm and 10% in the 2-stent arm (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-0.97; p = 0.035). There was a predominance of increased AMI (8.0% vs. 3.7%; HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.41-0.97; p =0.035) and treated vessel revascularization (HR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.26-0.96; p = 0.038) in the PS arm. There was no difference in the safety endpoint between the two arms.

Among patients in the PS arm, patients requiring 2 stents had higher TLF rates, which was attributed to the high rate of repeat revascularization. Finally, patients who experienced intraprocedural complications had a higher rate of TLF at 1 year compared with patients with no complications.

Conclusion

The risk of future events remains present for patients with complex coronary bifurcation lesions with no events 1 year after the procedure.

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: 3-Year Outcomes After 2-Stent With Provisional Stenting for Complex Bifurcation Lesions Defined by DEFINITION Criteria.

Reference: Jing Kan, MBBS et alJ Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2022;15:1310–1320.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

CRABBIS Trial: Comparison of Different Provisional Stenting Sequences

Provisional stenting (PS) is the gold standard for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in most patients with coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL). Moreover, recent studies such...

Andromeda Trial: Meta-Analysis of Drug Coated Balloon vs. DES in Small Vessel DeNovo Lesions

The use of coronary stents vs plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), has allowed to reduce recoil and limiting flow dissection which were major limitation...

QFR vs. FFR: Is Coronary Revascularization Deferral Safe? Results from a FAVOR III Sub-Analysis

In cases of intermediate coronary lesions, functional assessment is recommended to aid the decision-making process regarding revascularization. There are several tools currently used to...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...

STRIDE: Semaglutide in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Type II Diabetes

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a severe complication in patients with type II diabetes, primarily affecting peripheral vessels, especially below-the-knee (BTK) arteries. This condition...