Angioplasty in Nonagenarians Is Increasingly Frequent: How Does It Evolve?

Currently, the number of nonagenarian patients undergoing angioplasty (whether elective, urgent or emergency) has increased. 

Pacientes que no siguen nuestro consejo y sorpresivamente tienen menos eventos

This population is linked to more comorbidities and has barely been included in most randomized studies or registries. As such, we do not have robust evidence on this group.

Researchers conducted an analysis of the J-PCI OUTCOME Registry, in which patients were divided according to their age into 4 groups: 60-69 years (13,155 patients: 32.3%); 70-79 years (16,874: 41.4%); 80-89 years (9813: 24.1%), and ≥90 years (88: 2.2%).

Compared with younger patients, the group of nonagenarians was comprised mostly of females (54%) with lower rates of diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, and cardiac and renal failure. However, this group was linked to higher rates of acute coronary syndromes, left main coronary artery disease, and three-vessel lesions.

Transradial access was the least employed access in this group, and there were no differences between groups in the use of stents and drug-eluting balloons, procedure time, or bleeding in the access site. Nonetheless, there were more instances of bleeding unrelated to the access site compared with the rest of the groups.

Read also: TRICVALVE in Patients with Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation: Promising Results at 6 months

After a 1-year follow-up, mortality and bleeding rates were higher in nonagenarian patients compared with younger patients (1.5x higher than in octogenarians).

Cardiovascular death, infarction, and stroke in patients ≥90 years old were 13.5%, 8.1%, and 6.8%, respectively, after a 1-year follow-up. Furthermore, these patients had higher rates of fatal acute coronary syndromes, heart failure, and major bleeding.

The predictors of MACE at 1 year were cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, and anticoagulant use.

Conclusion

Currently, nonagenarians undergoing angioplasty continue to experience a considerable increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events, which reduces their survival. In addition, they present severe injuries with adverse events including increased rates of MACE, death, and major bleeding, occurring 1.5x more often in nonagenarian patients than in octogenarians.

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: One-year outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention in nonagenarians: Insights from the J-PCI OUTCOME registry.

Reference: Kanichi Otowa, et al. Am Heart J 2022;246:105–116.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...

Morpheus Global Registry: Safety and efficacy of the long tapered BioMime™ Morph stent in complex coronary lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention in long coronary lesions continues to represent a technical and clinical challenge, in which the use of conventional cylindrical stents may...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

Comparison of strategies: NMA of IVUS, OCT, or angiography in complex lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions continues to represent a technical challenge in contemporary interventional cardiology. Angiography, although it remains the most widely...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...

Can TAVI Be Safely Performed in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve?

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) represents an anatomical challenge for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) due to the frequent presence of elliptical annuli, fibroc calcific...

FFR Assessment for the Selection of Hypertensive Patients Who Benefit from Renal Stenting

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) represents one of the main causes of secondary hypertension (HTN) and is associated with a higher risk of renal...