Can We Discharge TAVR Patients the Same Day?

For over a decade, TAVR has been showing great benefits, but conduction abnormalities such as RBBB and prior A-V block, continue to be one of the biggest challenges, since in different series the need for definite pacemaker implantation (PPM) varies between 17 to 30% in the large, randomized studies of self-expanding valves.  

alta en el mismo día post TAVI

Even though we are well aware a higher implantation depth of the percutaneous valve (cusp overlapping) has been shown to significantly reduce the need for PPM, it has not yet been tested in large, randomized studies. 

68,482 patients receiving TAVR via femoral approach were looked at. 20,261 (29.6%) of these patients got early discharge (ED), between 0 and 1 day, and 48,221 late discharge (LD), ≥2 days.

Primary end point was rehospitalization for PPM. 

ED patients were younger (79 ± 8 years vs. 80 ± 7.6 years p < 0.01), there were more men, fewer were diabetic or presented kidney failure, COPD, peripheral vascular disease, or stroke, and had more programmed procedures. Besides, they presented fewer conduction abnormalities such as first and second-degree AV block, RBBB and fascicular blocks. 

Read also: Heparin Pretreatment in STEACS Treatment: A New Old Ally?

There were no differences in primary end point between ED and LD patients (2.0% vs. 1.8%; adjusted odds ratio: 1.15; 95% confidence interval: 0.95–1.39; p=0.15). Neither were there differences in readmissions for PPM at 30 and 60 days, or between elective and non-elective readmission. 

Mean time for readmission was 5 days, with no differences between ED and LD.

ED was associated to lower hospital expenses compared against LD.

Read also: RIPCORD 2 Study: Routine Assessment Using Pressure Wires in Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Predictors of PPM were 2-degree A-V block, fascicular blocks, RBBB and kidney failure. 

Conclusion

Early and late discharge TAVR patients who did not require permanent pacemaker implantation during hospitalization showed similar readmission rate for pacemaker implantation. 

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Early versus late discharge after transcatheter aortic valve replacement and readmissions for permanent pacemaker implantation. 

Reference: Ahmed M. Elzanaty, et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;100:245–253.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Hemodynamic Outcomes of Edge-to-Edge Repair in Degenerative and Functional Mitral Regurgitation

Transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (M-TEER) has become an established therapeutic option for mitral valve disease. Among the available techniques, M-TEER using the MitraClip...

SAPIEN 3 TAVI Durability: Ten-Year Follow-Up in Intermediate-Risk Patients

The durability of transcatheter bioprosthetic valves used in TAVI remains one of the key unanswered questions as indications continue to expand toward patients with...

Inflammation after TAVI: An Emerging Therapeutic Target?

Conduction disturbances and the need for permanent pacemaker implantation remain common complications following TAVI, with an incidence approaching 15%. Although they have traditionally been...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...