The New Sirolimus Eluting Balloons Are Also Effective

The technological development of drug eluting stents has allowed us to treat increasingly complex patients, with around 10% stenosis and using more, and longer stents. 

stent-liberador-drogas-sirolimus-everolimus

This situation generates a great challenge: keep using stents or use paclitaxel coated balloons (PCB). At present, there are sirolimus drug coated balloons (SCB), but we do not have enough data to determine which one performs better. 

This is the first randomized study to compare SCB against PCB in the treatment of instent restenosis.

The study included 101 patients: 50 received PCI with SCB and 51 with PCB.

Primary end point at 6 months was Late Lumen Loss (LLL) by quantitative angiography.

There were no differences between populations. 80% were men, 57% diabetic and 35% were admitted with unstable angina. Neither were there angiographic differences after procedure. 

Read also: Use of OCT FFR on ACS Clinical Outcomes.

After a 6-month follow-up, there were no differences in primary end point (LLL 0.25±0.57 mm in PCB vs 0.26±0.60 mm in SCB).

After 12 months, there were no differences in death, MI, ischemia driven revascularization or restenosis. 

Conclusion

This is the first study to compare the new sirolimus coated balloon against paclitaxel coated balloons. This study has shown similar angiographic and clinical evolution in the treatment of instent restenosis.

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Combined Analysis of Two Parallel Randomized Trials of Sirolimus-Coated and Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in Coronary In-Stent Restenosis Lesions.

Reference: Bruno Scheller,et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;15:e012305. DOI:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012305.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

ACC 2025 | FLAVOUR II: Angiography-Derived FFR-Guided vs. IVUS-Guided PCI

Physiological assessment is effective when it comes to decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite the available evidence, its use remains limited. AngioFFR...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

ACC 2025 | TAVI in Low-Risk Patients: 5-Year Outcomes of EVOLUTE LOW RISK

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one of its main limitations...