Results of the COMPARE Study After 2 Years: Low Dose vs. High Dose Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

The development of new devices and techniques has expanded the range of patients who benefit from endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal lesions. Paclitaxel-eluting devices have improved clinical results and treated-vessel patency at follow-up compared with conventional angioplasty. Currently, devices with different doses of paclitaxel are available in the market.

Resultados del estudio COMPARE a 2 años: Balones cubiertos de Paclitaxel con bajas dosis vs altas dosis

The COMPARE (Compare I Pilot Study for the Treatment of Subjects with Symptomatic Femoropopliteal Artery Disease) study compared low-dose (Ranger) vs. high-dose (IN-PACT) paclitaxel-coated balloons, showing that the former were non-inferior in terms of efficacy and safety after 1 year.

The aim of this prospective, multicenter study was to evaluate efficacy and safety results after 2 years.

The primary endpoint was absence of clinically guided treated-vessel revascularization or restenosis assessed by a Doppler study. Additionally, researchers analyzed a safety endpoint and clinical results.

This study analyzed 414 patients randomized between the low-dose arm and the high-dose arm. Mean patient age was 68 years old, and most subjects were male. The most frequent clinical presentation was Rutherford class III. There were no differences between groups in terms of the characteristics of treated lesions (lesion length, chronic occlusion %, and calcification level). Technical and procedural success rates were also similar.

Read also: Prognostic Impact of Acute Kidney Injury Following Tricuspid Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair.

After 2 years, the patency rate was 70% for the low-dose arm, and 71% for the high-dose arm (p = 0.96). There was no difference in all-cause mortality or clinically guided revascularization.

Conclusion

This study has shown a sustained and comparable effect regarding the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions between balloons coated with low and high doses of paclitaxel in terms of treated-vessel patency and need for revascularization after 2 years.

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Low-Dose vs High-Dose Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons for Femoropopliteal Lesions 2-Year Results From the COMPARE Trial.

Reference: Sabine Steiner, MD et al J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2022.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Endovascular Treatment of Iliofemoral Disease for the Improvement of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a significant risk factor in the development of difficult-to-treat conditions, such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)....

Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: Treatment Outcomes According to a Worldwide Registry

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a highly limiting condition that, despite its moderate incidence, significantly impacts patient prognosis and quality of life. The...

Contemporary Outcomes of Acute Limb Ischemia Endovascular Revascularization

Acute limb ischemia (ALI) is a vascular emergency with high mortality rate. It has been defined as a sudden occlusion of limb perfusion compromising...

TCT 2024 | SIRONA: Randomized Study Comparing Sirolimus-Coated vs Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in Femoropopliteal Disease

This prospective, randomized, multicenter, investigator-initiated non-inferiority study compared the use of sirolimus-coated balloon (MagicTouch) vs paclitaxel-coated balloon in endovascular treatment.  The primary objective was to...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Long Term Results of the International Chimney Registry

The International Chimney Registry was an observational study aimed at assessing the use of chimney stenting during TAVR either to predict or treat coronary...

CANNULATE TAVR extended study: Impact of Commissural and Coronary Alignment in Coronary Cannulation Following TAVR with Evolut Fx

The new valve Evolut FX has shown better commissural alignment vs. its predecessor Evolut Pro+. Prior studies have already shown commissure alignment facilitates post...

TRISCEND II: Transcatheter Replacement vs. Medical Treatment for Tricuspid Regurgitation

The EVOQUE device is designed with an intra-annular sealing system that provides excellent anatomical compatibility and an adaptable shape. It is currently available in...