Results of the COMPARE Study After 2 Years: Low Dose vs. High Dose Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

The development of new devices and techniques has expanded the range of patients who benefit from endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal lesions. Paclitaxel-eluting devices have improved clinical results and treated-vessel patency at follow-up compared with conventional angioplasty. Currently, devices with different doses of paclitaxel are available in the market.

Resultados del estudio COMPARE a 2 años: Balones cubiertos de Paclitaxel con bajas dosis vs altas dosis

The COMPARE (Compare I Pilot Study for the Treatment of Subjects with Symptomatic Femoropopliteal Artery Disease) study compared low-dose (Ranger) vs. high-dose (IN-PACT) paclitaxel-coated balloons, showing that the former were non-inferior in terms of efficacy and safety after 1 year.

The aim of this prospective, multicenter study was to evaluate efficacy and safety results after 2 years.

The primary endpoint was absence of clinically guided treated-vessel revascularization or restenosis assessed by a Doppler study. Additionally, researchers analyzed a safety endpoint and clinical results.

This study analyzed 414 patients randomized between the low-dose arm and the high-dose arm. Mean patient age was 68 years old, and most subjects were male. The most frequent clinical presentation was Rutherford class III. There were no differences between groups in terms of the characteristics of treated lesions (lesion length, chronic occlusion %, and calcification level). Technical and procedural success rates were also similar.

Read also: Prognostic Impact of Acute Kidney Injury Following Tricuspid Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair.

After 2 years, the patency rate was 70% for the low-dose arm, and 71% for the high-dose arm (p = 0.96). There was no difference in all-cause mortality or clinically guided revascularization.

Conclusion

This study has shown a sustained and comparable effect regarding the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions between balloons coated with low and high doses of paclitaxel in terms of treated-vessel patency and need for revascularization after 2 years.

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Low-Dose vs High-Dose Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons for Femoropopliteal Lesions 2-Year Results From the COMPARE Trial.

Reference: Sabine Steiner, MD et al J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2022.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Impact of Baseline Systolic Blood Pressure on Blood Pressure Changes Following Renal Denervation

Renal denervation (RDN) is a guideline-recommended therapy to reduce blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, although uncertainties remain regarding which factors best predict...

Hypertriglyceridemia as Key Factor to Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Development and Rupture: Genetic and Experimental Evidence

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a deadly vascular disease with no effective drug treatment, and risk of rupture reaching up to 80%. Even though...

Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease: Outcomes of Different Stroke Prevention Strategies

Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects approximately 1 in every 4 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This population carries a high burden of comorbidities and...

Safety of Prophylactic Spinal Fluid Drainage in Open and Endovascular Repair of Thoracic and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Spinal cord injury remains one of the most devastating complications of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair, mainly associated to a compromised the Adamkiewicz artery...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....