Results of the COMPARE Study After 2 Years: Low Dose vs. High Dose Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

The development of new devices and techniques has expanded the range of patients who benefit from endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal lesions. Paclitaxel-eluting devices have improved clinical results and treated-vessel patency at follow-up compared with conventional angioplasty. Currently, devices with different doses of paclitaxel are available in the market.

Resultados del estudio COMPARE a 2 años: Balones cubiertos de Paclitaxel con bajas dosis vs altas dosis

The COMPARE (Compare I Pilot Study for the Treatment of Subjects with Symptomatic Femoropopliteal Artery Disease) study compared low-dose (Ranger) vs. high-dose (IN-PACT) paclitaxel-coated balloons, showing that the former were non-inferior in terms of efficacy and safety after 1 year.

The aim of this prospective, multicenter study was to evaluate efficacy and safety results after 2 years.

The primary endpoint was absence of clinically guided treated-vessel revascularization or restenosis assessed by a Doppler study. Additionally, researchers analyzed a safety endpoint and clinical results.

This study analyzed 414 patients randomized between the low-dose arm and the high-dose arm. Mean patient age was 68 years old, and most subjects were male. The most frequent clinical presentation was Rutherford class III. There were no differences between groups in terms of the characteristics of treated lesions (lesion length, chronic occlusion %, and calcification level). Technical and procedural success rates were also similar.

Read also: Prognostic Impact of Acute Kidney Injury Following Tricuspid Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair.

After 2 years, the patency rate was 70% for the low-dose arm, and 71% for the high-dose arm (p = 0.96). There was no difference in all-cause mortality or clinically guided revascularization.

Conclusion

This study has shown a sustained and comparable effect regarding the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions between balloons coated with low and high doses of paclitaxel in terms of treated-vessel patency and need for revascularization after 2 years.

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Low-Dose vs High-Dose Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons for Femoropopliteal Lesions 2-Year Results From the COMPARE Trial.

Reference: Sabine Steiner, MD et al J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2022.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

C-TRACT: Endovascular therapy in post-thrombotic syndrome due to iliac obstruction

Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is one of the most limiting sequelae following proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT). It clinically manifests as chronic pain, edema, skin...

Coil embolization of segmental arteries as a spinal cord protection strategy prior to complex endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aorta

Spinal cord ischemia remains one of the most devastating complications in the repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms, with incidences of up to 20–30% in extensive...

Mechanical thrombectomy versus anticoagulation in intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism: systematic review and meta-analysis

Intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) has anticoagulation as the standard treatment, while reperfusion strategies remain a matter of debate. In this context, mechanical thrombectomy has...

Therapeutic strategies in carotid free-floating thrombus: evidence and controversies

Carotid free-floating thrombus (cFFT) is a rare entity with a high embolic risk, associated with acute neurological events such as stroke or transient ischemic...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

SCAI 2026 | SELUTION DeNovo subanalysis: Use of sirolimus-eluting balloon in acute coronary syndrome

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation remains the predominant strategy in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, in recent...

Beyond TAVI: Cardiac Rehabilitation as a Determinant of Clinical Outcomes

Aortic stenosis is an increasingly prevalent condition associated with population aging, with a prevalence of approximately 3.4% in individuals over 75 years of age...

Comparative outcomes between transaxillary approach and thoracotomy-based approaches in TAVI with alternative access

TAVI has become the standard treatment for high-risk aortic stenosis. When transfemoral access is not feasible (approximately 10–15%), alternative approaches are used: transaxillary (subclavian...