Retrograde Tibial Access for Endovascular Treatment of Femoropopliteal Occlusions: Is it a Safe Strategy?

Endovascular recanalization of femoropopliteal occlusions continues to be one of the initial therapeutic strategies to treat this pathology. 

Acceso retrógrado mediante la arteria tibial para el tratamiento de oclusiones en territorio femoropoplíteo: ¿es una estrategia segura?

The anterograde approach via the common femoral is the most frequently used. However, it is not always viable, especially in long occlusions with severe calcification or when the femoral artery cannot be reached. In these cases, the retrograde approach represents a safe and effective strategy. 

The aim of this retrospective, single center study was to assess the safety, efficacy and feasibility of retrograde crossing of femoropopliteal occlusions with tibial access after failed anterograde approach. 

Primary efficacy endpoint was retrograde crossing success rate. secondary efficacy endpoint was technical success rate. Primary safety endpoint was the rate of acute (≤30 days) access site-specific complications. 

Secondary safety endpoints included the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 30 days (30-day MACE) and the rate of acute (≤30 days) intervention-specific complications.

Primary feasibility endpoint was rate of successful cannulation and sheath introduction. Secondary feasibility endpoints included the cannulation time and the time for hemostasis.

Read also: PICCOLETO-II: balones liberadores de droga en vasos pequeños.

From 2015 to 2022 the study looked at 152 patients. Mean age was 74 and 50.7% were men. The most frequent clinical presentation was resting pain in 67.8% (Rutherford IV), followed by Rutherford III in 22.4% of patients. Mean lesion length was 25 cm, and 45% of cases presented PACSS calcification grade III followed by grade IV in 43%. The proximal tract of the anterior tibial artery was the most used (60.5%), and sheath inductor and cannulation (4Fr in 50.7%) were successful in all cases.  

Rate of retrograde crossing of femoropopliteal occlusions was 94%. As regards Access site related complications within 30 days, these were found in 4.6% of patients. Specific complications associated to the intervention happened in 12.5% of cases. MACE rate was 3.3% and MALE rate (major adverse limb events) was 2%. 

Conclusion

Retrograde crossing of femoropopliteal occlusions with tibial access after anterograde failed approach is feasible, safe and effective. It could be an interesting alternative to combine both these approaches. This calls for further prospective, randomized and multicenter studies with long term follow up. 

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the editorial board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Endovascular treatment of femoro‐popliteal occlusions with retrograde tibial access after failure of the antegrade approach.

Reference: Roberto Minici MD et al Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;1–12.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

TCT 2024 | SIRONA: Randomized Study Comparing Sirolimus-Coated vs Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in Femoropopliteal Disease

This prospective, randomized, multicenter, investigator-initiated non-inferiority study compared the use of sirolimus-coated balloon (MagicTouch) vs paclitaxel-coated balloon in endovascular treatment.  The primary objective was to...

TCT 2024 | PEERLESS: Mechanical Thrombectomy with FlowTriever vs Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in Intermediate Risk PTE

Pulmonary embolism (PE) continues to be the third cause of cardiovascular mortality. The current clinical guidelines recommend anticoagulation in intermediate risk patients presenting right...

Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis: To Revascularize or Not

At long term, atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RAS) can lead to hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and cardiac failure. Historically, these patients have been referred...

Endovascular Management of Chronic TEPH: Is Coronary Management Extrapolatable in This Scenario?

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a condition that causes significant functional limitation. Its surgical treatment, known as pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), has improved the...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 | TRISCEND II

This randomized study included 400 patients; 267 were treated with EVOQUE valve and 133 with optimal medical treatment (OMT). After one-year follow-up, there were no...

TCT 2024 – ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Percutaneous Access Closure Strategies After TAVI

Vascular access complications following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain common. However, few studies compare vascular access closure methods.  Based on the CHOICE-CLOSURE and MASH...