Evolute Low Risk at 3 Years: Promising Outcomes

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement has shown important benefits but one of its biggest challenges is showing its safety and efficacy at followup in low risk patients. At present we have 2-year data from the Evolute Low Risk, but the we lack information at longer followup. 

TAVI bajo riesgo

The study looked at 3-year followup of the Evolute Low Risk including 1414 patients, with 730 receiving TAVR (51.6%) and 630 surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR, 48.4%). 

Primary end point was all cause death or disabling stroke at 3 years.

There were no differences between the populations: mean age was 73, 65% were men, 30% presented diabetes, 85% hypertension, 16% COPD, 8% peripheral vascular disease, 2% prior CABG, 14% prior PCI, 5% prior AMI, 15% atrial fibrillation, 3.5% definite pacemaker implantation. Ejection fraction was 61%.

Mortality STS was 2% and SYNTAX I was 2.

Primary end point for TAVR and SABR resulted 7.4% vs. 10.4% (HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.49-1.00; log-rank P=0.051) respectively.

Read also: CLOUT Registry: Thrombectomy in TVP with ClotTriever.

At 3 years, there were no differences between TAVR and SAVR in mortality (6.3% vs. 8.3% HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.51-1.12; P=0.16) and disabling stroke (2.3% vs. 3.4% HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.34-1.24; P=0.19) 

The combined end point of all-cause mortality, disabling stroke and valve related rehospitalization was 13,2% for TAVR vs. 16.2% for SAVR (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.58-1.00; P=0.050).

Atrial fibrillation rate was higher in patients receiving SAVR (13% vs. 40%, p<0.01) and the need for definite pacemaker was higher among TAVR patients (23.2% vs. 9.1% p<0.01).

Moderate prosthetic mismatch was lower among TAVR patients (10.6 vs. 25.5, p=0.01).

Read also: Retrograde Tibial Access for Endovascular Treatment of Femoropopliteal Occlusions: Is it a Safe Strategy?

There were no differences between the groups when it came to moderate or severe leaks, but TAVR showed more mild leaks. 

There were no differences in AMI, major vascular complications, valve thrombosis or endocarditis. 

Conclusion

At 3 years, the Evolute Low Risk showed the benefits of TAVR are durable as regards all-cause mortality or disabling stroke vs. SAVR. 

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: 3-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis. 

Reference: John K. Forrest , et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023;81:1663–1674. 


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

One-Year Results of ENCIRCLE: Percutaneous Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients Ineligible for Surgery or TEER

Symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients who are not candidates for surgery or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) remains a highly complex clinical scenario associated...

Can Coronary CT Angiography Replace Invasive Coronary Angiography in Pre-TAVI Coronary Assessment?

Coronary artery disease coexists in approximately half of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation, making coronary assessment prior to the procedure essential. Invasive coronary...

Valve-in-Valve in Small Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: Balloon-Expandable or Self-Expanding? Three-Year Results from the LYTEN Trial

Dysfunction of small surgical aortic bioprostheses represents a challenging scenario for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the valve-in-valve setting, due to the higher incidence...

Can TAVI Be Safely Performed in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve?

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) represents an anatomical challenge for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) due to the frequent presence of elliptical annuli, fibroc calcific...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Sheathless Femoral Impella: A New Strategy to Reduce Vascular Complications in High-Risk PCI?

Patients with complex coronary artery disease or cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may benefit from the hemodynamic support provided by percutaneous ventricular...

OCT- and IVUS-Guided Coronary Angioplasty in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Long-Term Clinical Outcomes

Percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has reduced mortality in the acute phase. However, recurrent ACS and target vessel...

One-Year Results of ENCIRCLE: Percutaneous Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients Ineligible for Surgery or TEER

Symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients who are not candidates for surgery or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) remains a highly complex clinical scenario associated...