Coronary Calcification: More Frequent Use of Coronary Lithotripsy as a Recommendation

Coronary calcification, whether concentric or eccentric, has always posed a challenge in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) due to difficulties in plaque preparation, device navigability, proper stent apposition, drug release, and potential complications during the procedure.

Calcificaciones coronarias, deberíamos comenzar a utilizar con mayor frecuencia la litotricia coronaria

This study analyzed 262 patients who participated in the four Disrupt CAD OCT Studies and underwent PCI using coronary lithotripsy followed by assessment with optical coherence tomography (OCT).

Patients were divided into groups based on their calcification degree relative to the vessel circumference: 56 patients had calcification ≤180°, 57 between 180° and 270°, 51 between 271° and 359°, and 66 had complete 360° calcification.

There were no significant differences between the groups. The average age was 72 years, and most patients were male; 80% of subjects had hypertension, 20% had experienced a heart attack, and 20% had impaired kidney function. Diabetes was more common in patients with calcification between 271° and 359°, as well as in those with complete 360° calcification.

Read also: TCT 2023 | TRILUMINATE Trial: Health Status after TriClip.

The use of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) was found to be safe, as it was not associated with complications such as dissection or occlusion.

During the procedure, there were no significant differences in terms of pre-dilation, post-dilation, treated artery, segment of the treated artery, vessel diameter, or type of stent used.

Post-procedure OCT analysis revealed that the number, depth, and width of fractures in calcification increased as calcification became more concentric. In particular, 360° calcifications showed a fourfold higher incidence of fractures compared with those ≤180°. Furthermore, this facilitated more concentric stent expansion, with greater lumen gain, without significant differences between quartiles.

Conclusion

In summary, lithotripsy induced fractures in coronary calcification that were proportional to the extent of calcification, even in eccentric cases. This led to a consistent improvement in stent expansion and luminal gain, both in concentric and eccentric calcifications in coronary arteries.

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Impact of Calcium Eccentricity on the Safety and Effectiveness of Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy: Pooled Analysis From the Disrupt CAD Studies.

Reference: Ziad A. Ali, et al. 


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...