AHA 2023 | Use of Apixaban for Stroke Prevention in Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation

Subclinical atrial fibrillation (AF), generally asymptomatic and of short duration, often requires continuous long-term monitoring using pacemakers or defibrillators for its detection. While subclinical AF is linked to an increased risk of stroke, the usefulness of oral anticoagulation as a treatment remains uncertain.

AHA 2023 | ORBITA-2: Angioplastia coronaria vs placebo en angina estable para la reducción de síntomas

In a double-blind randomized trial, one group received apixaban and the other received aspirin. The primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of systemic embolism or stroke (SE), while the primary safety endpoint focused on the rate of major bleeding.

The sample included 4012 patients with an average age of 76 years and an average CHA2DS2-VASc score of 3.9. Of them, 36% were women. In terms of the primary efficacy endpoint, the incidence in the apixaban group was 0.78%, compared with 1.24% in the aspirin group (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45-0.88; P=0.007). The rate of major bleeding was 1.71% in the apixaban group and 0.94% in the aspirin group (HR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.26-2.57; P=0.001).

Conclusion

Among patients with subclinical AF, the use of apixaban led to a lower risk of systemic embolism or stroke compared with aspirin, although it was also associated with an increased risk of major bleeding.

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Apixaban for Stroke Prevention in Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation.

Reference: Jeff S. Healey, M.D et al. 


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

AHA 2025 | DAPT-MVD: Extended DAPT vs. Aspirin Monotherapy After PCI in Multivessel Disease

In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who remain stable 12 months after drug-eluting stent (DES) stenting, there is uncertainty as to prolonging dual...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....