Untreated Aortic Stenosis: Associated Mortality and a Call to Attention

The progression of aortic stenosis has been extensively studied and is well-known. As observed, in its advanced stages, this condition entails high morbidity and a marked decrease in survival. Both North American and European guidelines recommend treatment when faced with severe valve disease. However, true severity can be difficult to determine due to discordant data, such as peak velocity not matching the valve area.

Estenosis aórtica no tratada: mortalidad asociada y un llamado de atención

Underestimation of severity leads to undertreatment, worsening the prognosis. Based on this premise, the group led by Généreux et al. aimed to assess mortality across the spectrum of untreated aortic stenosis in a contemporary cohort.

The studied population was compiled from 1,669,536 echocardiograms corresponding to a database of 1,085,850 patients. The presence of aortic stenosis was classified by severity as none, mild, mild to moderate, moderate to severe, and severe. Events were evaluated at 4 years, with all-cause mortality related to untreated aortic stenosis as the study’s primary endpoint. The secondary endpoint was time until treatment with aortic valve replacement (AVR).

Read also: Cerebral Embolic Protection Devices: How Useful are they in TAVR?

A total of 595,120 patients met the eligibility criteria, with a mean time from diagnosis to treatment, last follow-up, or mortality of 421 days. Of the total, 11.9% had some degree of aortic stenosis, while 81.1% showed no evidence of this condition. Among patients with aortic stenosis, 86.6% were classified as mild, moderate, or severe, and 13.4% as mild to moderate or moderate to severe.

Overall, patients in more severe stages experienced higher morbidity, were older, and had a greater likelihood of concomitant valve pathologies, such as tricuspid or mitral regurgitation. There was some degree of discordance in severity in 22.8% of all moderate cases and 59.8% of all moderate to severe cases.

The estimated untreated all-cause mortality at 4 years, associated with a diagnosis of aortic stenosis from none to mild, mild to moderate, moderate, moderate to severe, or severe, was 13.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 13.3%-13.7%), 25.0% (95% CI: 23.8%-26.1%), 29.7% (95% CI: 26.8%-32.5%), 33.5% (95% CI: 31.0%-35.8%), 45.7% (95% CI: 37.4%-52.8%), and 44.9% (95% CI: 39.9%-49.6%), respectively. The rate for AVR treatment was 1% in mild cases and 60.7% in severe cases.

Read also: Is TAVR Beneficial in Cardiogenic Shock?

An analysis using the hazard model demonstrated a trend of increased mortality with each increment in aortic stenosis severity. After adjustment, all degrees of aortic stenosis severity were associated with a higher risk of untreated mortality.

Conclusions

Diagnoses of intermediate severity (mild to moderate or moderate to severe) are common in daily practice according to this analyzed cohort and are associated with mortality similar to their next more severe grade of aortic stenosis. Significant undertreatment of severe aortic stenosis is notable, with AVR conducted in only 60% of patients up to 4 years after the initial diagnosis. The risk of mortality with aortic stenosis gradually increased across the spectrum of disease severity, emphasizing the importance of rigorous monitoring and early intervention.

Dr. Omar Tupayachi

Dr. Omar Tupayachi.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: The Mortality Burden of Untreated Aortic Stenosis.

Reference: Généreux P, Sharma RP, Cubeddu RJ, Aaron L, Abdelfattah OM, Koulogiannis KP, Marcoff L, Naguib M, Kapadia SR, Makkar RR, Thourani VH, van Boxtel BS, Cohen DJ, Dobbles M, Barnhart GR, Kwon M, Pibarot P, Leon MB, Gillam LD. The Mortality Burden of Untreated Aortic Stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Oct 20:S0735-1097(23)07504-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.09.796. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37877909.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Hemodynamic Outcomes of Edge-to-Edge Repair in Degenerative and Functional Mitral Regurgitation

Transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (M-TEER) has become an established therapeutic option for mitral valve disease. Among the available techniques, M-TEER using the MitraClip...

SAPIEN 3 TAVI Durability: Ten-Year Follow-Up in Intermediate-Risk Patients

The durability of transcatheter bioprosthetic valves used in TAVI remains one of the key unanswered questions as indications continue to expand toward patients with...

Inflammation after TAVI: An Emerging Therapeutic Target?

Conduction disturbances and the need for permanent pacemaker implantation remain common complications following TAVI, with an incidence approaching 15%. Although they have traditionally been...

Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: A New Volumetric Index to Consider

Coronary obstruction during TAVI is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication, particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, in anatomies with small sinuses of Valsalva, low coronary...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...

Dual-Prep Registry: Atherectomy and IVL for Severe Coronary Calcification

Severe coronary calcification remains one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although rotational or orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)...