Benefit of Cusp overlap method for self‐expanding transcatheter aortic valves

The need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPM) continues to be one of the main challenges in TAVR, especially with self-expanding valves, with a pacemaker implantation rate that varies between 17.5% and 30% in large randomized studies, vs. 4% to 6.5% with self-expanding valves.

Beneficio del implante alto de las válvulas aórticas percutáneas autoexpandibles 

Therefore, in an attempt to prevent the need for PPM implantation, the cusp overlapping technique has been developed (COT) which several analysts have shown has a lower rate vs the conventional implantation technique also called three cusp technique (3C). However, at present, this technique still calls for robust, large randomized trials. 

This study looked at 647 patients undergoing TAVR with self-expanding EVOLUT; 519 (80.2%) with the COT technique.

Both groups were similar, with mean age 82, but surgical scores were higher in those treated with the 3C technique. 

Left ventricular function was higher in COT patients (58% vs. 53%, p<0.001), with 41 mmHg gradient and close to 2% bicuspid valves. 

Read also: Does Post-Dilation in TAVR Affect its Long-Term Outcomes?

Valve 29 was the most used (45%), followed by the 26 (35%), and 34 (12%) and, in lower numbers, the 23; the transfemoral approach was used in nearly all patients.

At 30 days, patients treated with the COT technique showed lower need for PPM implantation (10% vs. 21%, p=<0.001) and one new AV block (11% vs. 23%, p<0.001), with no difference in new intraventricular conduction block. 

Conclusion

COT presents some potential technical advantages vs. 3C, and perhaps a lower rate of PPM implantation in TAVR with self-expanding EVOLUT. 

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Cusp overlap method for self‐expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Reference: Talal F. Aljabbary, et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024;103:202–208.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...

Cardiac Remodeling After Percutaneous ASD Closure: Should It Be Immediate or Progressive?

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common congenital heart disease that generates a left-to-right shunt, leading to right-side chamber overload and a risk of...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...