Use of Intravascular Lithotripsy in Left Main

The Left main coronary artery supplies circulation to roughly 70% of myocardium, and left main disease requires a high risk intervention with significant impact on patient prognosis. The current guidelines have set the threshold for intervention in LM disease at ≥50% stenosis, irrespective of the presence of symptoms or ischemic burden. 

La ATC es una alternativa válida en el TCI

LM calcification is an independent predictor of to all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Suboptimal preparation and treatment of LM calcified lesions often results in technical failure, with considerably higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. 

The use of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has experienced a steady growth over the years. It delivers controlled sonic pressure waves which selectively fracture calcified plaque within arteries, facilitating effective stent expansion. Though already shown safe and effective for calcification management, there is still little information on IVL assisted left main PCI at short term. 

This retrospective multicenter study was carried out in seven centers across the US. It included patients with severe “de novo” left main lesions, both in acute (ACS) and chronic syndromes, assessed with fluoroscopy or intravascular imaging showing ≥270° of calcium on at least 1 cross-section of the target lesion. 

Read also: Edge-to-Edge Repair in Cardiogenic Shock

Between January 2019 and January 2023, data from 184 patients undergoing IVL assisted left main PCI were collected. Patients were predominantly ACS cases (65.4%), with severe calcification was present in 90.7% of patients based on angiographic criteria (100% based on IVI criteria); 25.1% presented LM bifurcation lesion.

Prior IVL, predilation was performed in 83.1% of cases and rotational atherectomy in 18.4% of cases. IVL administered mean 70 ± 27 IVL pulses during treatment. After IVL, balloon dilation was performed in 76.7% of cases, with 9.7% using a specialty balloon. Stenting was successful in 99.4% of cases, with a significant increase in minimal lumen area compared with post PCI minimal stent area (4.1 ± 1.3 to 9.3 ± 2.5 mm2, respectively; P <0.001).

Read also: Recurrent Revascularization at 10 Years after Percutaneous Treatment of DES In-Stent Restenosis

As regards adverse events, inhospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) rate was 4.4%, comprised of 3.9% all-cause mortality, 2.2% myocardial infarction and 0.6% coronary perforation and no reflow. 30-day MACE reached 8.8%, with 7.2% all-cause mortality and 3.3% myocardial infarction. After multivariable logistic regression, the presence of acute myocardial infarction was the only significant predictor of 30-day MACE. 

Conclusions

To sum up, IVL assisted percutaneous coronary intervention of calcified left main lesions showed high technical success, substantial post PCI lumen area increase and low risk of MACE at short term. 

Dr. Omar Tupayachi

Dr. Omar Tupayachi.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of Intravascular Lithotripsy Use During Calcified Left Main Coronary Artery Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Reference: Robert F. Riley, Larry E. Miller, Rhian Davies, Khaldoon Alaswad, Zaid Al-Jebaje, Darshan Doshi, Farouc A. Jaffer, Srikanth Adusumalli, Jarrod D. Frizzell, Kris Kumar, Mitul P. Patel, Ali Dakroub, Ziad A. Ali. Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of Intravascular Lithotripsy Use During Calcified Left Main Coronary Artery Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, Volume 3, Issue 2, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101213.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

CRABBIS Trial: Comparison of Different Provisional Stenting Sequences

Provisional stenting (PS) is the gold standard for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in most patients with coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL). Moreover, recent studies such...

Andromeda Trial: Meta-Analysis of Drug Coated Balloon vs. DES in Small Vessel DeNovo Lesions

The use of coronary stents vs plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), has allowed to reduce recoil and limiting flow dissection which were major limitation...

QFR vs. FFR: Is Coronary Revascularization Deferral Safe? Results from a FAVOR III Sub-Analysis

In cases of intermediate coronary lesions, functional assessment is recommended to aid the decision-making process regarding revascularization. There are several tools currently used to...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...

STRIDE: Semaglutide in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Type II Diabetes

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a severe complication in patients with type II diabetes, primarily affecting peripheral vessels, especially below-the-knee (BTK) arteries. This condition...