Edge-to-Edge Repair in Cardiogenic Shock

The edge-to-edge approach with MitraClip has been established as a valid strategy for patients who experience severe symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MI) with high risk for surgery, currently with a IIa indication.

La insuficiencia renal post tratamiento borde a borde tricuspídeo impacta en el pronóstico

MI complicated by cardiogenic shock, which results in a high risk for conventional valve surgery, is a particularly complex scenario. In such a case, edge-to-edge repair emerges as an alternative, despite the current lack of exhaustive analyses or randomized studies, with only a handful of publications available.

Researchers conducted a meta-analysis that included 12 studies (7 case series and 5 observational studies) involving 460 patients.

The primary endpoint (PEP) assessed was mortality at one year.

Mean patient age was 68 years; 40% of patients were women. In general, 70% of patients had hypertension, 35% had diabetes, 43% had impaired renal function, 20% had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), 11% had a prior stroke, 61% experienced coronary artery disease, and 49% had undergone a prior PCI. Additionally, 21% had undergone previous myocardial revascularization surgery. Ejection fraction was 36%.

Read also: Recurrent Revascularization at 10 Years after Percutaneous Treatment of DES In-Stent Restenosis.

About 74% of patients received inotropics, and a ventricular assist device was used as follows: 28% of patients received an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), 29% received an Impella device, and 13% of patients had extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

The most frequent cause of MI was functional (54%), followed by 26% of ischemic origin and 40% resulting from acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

The STS risk index was 17.7%.

The PEP at one year was 36% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 21%–54%), and the presence of MI <2+ was 88% (95% CI: 87%–89%).

Read also: Should We Use Ultrasound Routinely to Guide Transfemoral Access?

Mortality at 30 days was 11% (95% CI: 10%–13%) and 15% at 15 days (95% CI: 13%–16%), with an average hospital stay of 13.9 days (95% CI: 7.08–20.7).

Conclusion

This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical features and evolution of edge-to-edge repair in cardiogenic shock in patients with mitral regurgitation. The edge-to-edge approach in mitral regurgitation with cardiogenic shock has been shown to be successful in reducing mitral regurgitation in most patients, although it is associated with a high mortality rate. Randomized controlled studies on edge-to-edge treatment of mitral regurgitation in cardiogenic shock are absolutely imperative.

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Mmember of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Transcatheter edge‐to‐edge mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation in patients with cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta‐analysis.

Reference: Tetsuya Saito, et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024;103:340–347.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: A New Volumetric Index to Consider

Coronary obstruction during TAVI is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication, particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, in anatomies with small sinuses of Valsalva, low coronary...

EARLY TAVR: Impact of Age on Outcomes of Early TAVR in Asymptomatic Patients

Asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis represents an increasingly common clinical challenge. Although current guidelines recommend intervention once symptoms develop or left ventricular dysfunction occurs, concerns...

T-TEER: Beyond Traditional Pulmonary Hypertension Thresholds

Significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with progressive functional deterioration, heart failure (HF) hospitalizations, and increased mortality. In recent years, transcatheter tricuspid edge-to-edge repair...

Is left atrial appendage closure safe in patients with reduced ejection fraction?

Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) were excluded from the major randomized trials evaluating percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC), and...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: A New Volumetric Index to Consider

Coronary obstruction during TAVI is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication, particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, in anatomies with small sinuses of Valsalva, low coronary...

EARLY TAVR: Impact of Age on Outcomes of Early TAVR in Asymptomatic Patients

Asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis represents an increasingly common clinical challenge. Although current guidelines recommend intervention once symptoms develop or left ventricular dysfunction occurs, concerns...

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...