ACC 2024 | SMART Trial: Self-Expanding or Balloon-Expandable TAVR in Patients with Small Aortic Annulus

Patients with severe aortic stenosis and a small aortic annulus face an increased risk of deteriorated valvular hemodynamic performance and adverse cardiovascular clinical outcomes after undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

ACC 2024

This study, a prospective multicenter randomized trial, aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of two types of valves: the supra-annular self-expanding EVOLUT (SEV) and intra-annular balloon-expandable SAPIEN (BEV).

Patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and an aortic valve annulus area of 430 mm2 or less were randomized 1:1 to undergo TAVR with a supra-annular self-expanding valve or a balloon-expandable valve. The primary endpoints, assessed over 12 months, were a composite of death, disabling stroke, or rehospitalization for heart failure (evaluated for non-inferiority) and a composite endpoint measuring bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (evaluated for superiority).

The study included a total of 716 patients, with a mean age of 80 years; most subjects were women (87%), and the average STS score was 3.3%. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of patients experiencing the composite events of death, disabling stroke, or rehospitalization for heart failure over 12 months was 9.4% with the self-expanding valve and 10.6% with the balloon-expandable valve (a difference of -1.2 percentage points; 90% confidence interval [CI] -4.9 to 2.5; P < 0.001 for non-inferiority).

Read also: ACC 2024 | PREVENT Study.

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of patients with bioprosthetic valve dysfunction over 12 months was 9.4% with the self-expanding valve and 41.6% with the balloon-expandable valve (a difference of -32.2 percentage points; 95% CI -38.7 to -25.6; P < 0.001 for superiority).

The mean aortic valve gradient at 12 months was 7.7 mm Hg with the self-expanding valve and 15.7 mm Hg with the balloon-expandable valve. The corresponding values for additional secondary endpoints over 12 months were, respectively, as follows: mean effective orifice area, 1.99 cm2 and 1.50 cm2; percentage of patients with hemodynamic structural valve dysfunction, 3.5% and 32.8%; and percentage of women with bioprosthetic valve dysfunction, 10.2% and 43.3% (P < 0.001 in all cases). The main safety endpoints appeared to be similar in both groups.

Conclusions

In conclusion, among patients with severe aortic stenosis and a small aortic annulus undergoing TAVR, the supra-annular self-expanding valve was non-inferior to the balloon-expandable valve in terms of clinical outcomes and superior in terms of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction over 12 months.

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the editorial board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Self-Expanding or Balloon-Expandable TAVR in Patients with a Small Aortic Annulus SMART trial.

Reference: Howard C. Herrmann, M.D et al.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Prospective Analysis of the Feasibility of the PASCAL System for Transcatheter Mitral Repair: OneForAll Registry

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) is an effective option for patients with severe mitral regurgitation who are at high...

Left Bundle Branch Block after TAVR: What Is Its Impact?

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is a common complication following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), which can be either...

Multicenter Experience with 3D Intracardiac Echocardiography for Guiding Interventional Cardiac Procedures

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. Imaging techniques play a fundamental role in interventional cardiac procedures. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) appears as an alternative to transesophageal...

Pathology of Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Bioprostheses and Hypoattenuated Leaflet Thickening

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. Despite the available long term followup data on of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), bioprosthesis durability continues under debate....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...

STRIDE: Semaglutide in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Type II Diabetes

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a severe complication in patients with type II diabetes, primarily affecting peripheral vessels, especially below-the-knee (BTK) arteries. This condition...