EuroPCR 2024 | 2 Year Outcomes of the New Sirolimus Eluting Bioadaptor vs Resolute Onyx Zotarolimus Elulting Stent

Stent related adverse events after the first year see a constant 2-3% annual increase, reaching 20% by year 5 and 50% by year 10. BIOADAPTADOR RCT outcomes at 12 months have shown the safety and efficacy of DynamX Bioadaptor, establishing new reference parameters in arterial viability restoration.

EuroPCR 2024

The aim of this study was to report clinical outcomes at 2 years and to confirm outcomes with imaging showing hemodynamic restauration assessed with IVUS/OCT/QCA. Primary end point was non-inferiority target vessel failure.

The study looked at 445 patients, 223 were randomized to DynamX Bioadaptor and 222 to RESOLUTE ONYX. Mean age was 67 and they were mostly men. The most common clinical presentation was stable angina, and the anterior descending was the most affected artery. Around 23% of patients presented compromised bifurcations and nearly 20% had obstructions with moderate to severe calcification.

Read also: EuroPCR 2024 | Specific Intracoronary Tests Combined with Angiography for Diagnosing Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome: The AID-ANGIO Study.

TLF at 1 year resulted 1.8% for the DynamX Bioadaptor group and 2.8% for the RESOLUTE ONYX (p<0.001 for non-inferiority). At 2 year followup, there was significant reduction of TLF in 59% (2.3% DynamX vs 5.5% RESOLUTE, HR=0.41, p=0.093). This reduction is owed to lower incidence of cardiovascular death, target vessel related MI and clinically driven target vessel revascularization.

Conclusion 

The DynamX Bioadaptor, with its innovative design and action mechanism, restores hemodynamic modulation and offers a significant clinical benefit, establishing a new therapy and a new standard of treatment for patients with coronary artery disease.

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: BIOADAPTOR RCT– 2-Year Outcomes Randomized Controlled Trial of Sirolimus-Eluting Bioadaptor Versus Zotarolimus-Eluting Drug-Eluting Stent.

Reference: Shigeru Saito MD et al. 


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

CRABBIS Trial: Comparison of Different Provisional Stenting Sequences

Provisional stenting (PS) is the gold standard for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in most patients with coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL). Moreover, recent studies such...

Andromeda Trial: Meta-Analysis of Drug Coated Balloon vs. DES in Small Vessel DeNovo Lesions

The use of coronary stents vs plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), has allowed to reduce recoil and limiting flow dissection which were major limitation...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...