EuroPCR 2024 | 2 Year Outcomes of the New Sirolimus Eluting Bioadaptor vs Resolute Onyx Zotarolimus Elulting Stent

Stent related adverse events after the first year see a constant 2-3% annual increase, reaching 20% by year 5 and 50% by year 10. BIOADAPTADOR RCT outcomes at 12 months have shown the safety and efficacy of DynamX Bioadaptor, establishing new reference parameters in arterial viability restoration.

EuroPCR 2024

The aim of this study was to report clinical outcomes at 2 years and to confirm outcomes with imaging showing hemodynamic restauration assessed with IVUS/OCT/QCA. Primary end point was non-inferiority target vessel failure.

The study looked at 445 patients, 223 were randomized to DynamX Bioadaptor and 222 to RESOLUTE ONYX. Mean age was 67 and they were mostly men. The most common clinical presentation was stable angina, and the anterior descending was the most affected artery. Around 23% of patients presented compromised bifurcations and nearly 20% had obstructions with moderate to severe calcification.

Read also: EuroPCR 2024 | Specific Intracoronary Tests Combined with Angiography for Diagnosing Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome: The AID-ANGIO Study.

TLF at 1 year resulted 1.8% for the DynamX Bioadaptor group and 2.8% for the RESOLUTE ONYX (p<0.001 for non-inferiority). At 2 year followup, there was significant reduction of TLF in 59% (2.3% DynamX vs 5.5% RESOLUTE, HR=0.41, p=0.093). This reduction is owed to lower incidence of cardiovascular death, target vessel related MI and clinically driven target vessel revascularization.

Conclusion 

The DynamX Bioadaptor, with its innovative design and action mechanism, restores hemodynamic modulation and offers a significant clinical benefit, establishing a new therapy and a new standard of treatment for patients with coronary artery disease.

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: BIOADAPTOR RCT– 2-Year Outcomes Randomized Controlled Trial of Sirolimus-Eluting Bioadaptor Versus Zotarolimus-Eluting Drug-Eluting Stent.

Reference: Shigeru Saito MD et al. 


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...