EuroPCR 2024 | 2 Year Outcomes of the New Sirolimus Eluting Bioadaptor vs Resolute Onyx Zotarolimus Elulting Stent

Stent related adverse events after the first year see a constant 2-3% annual increase, reaching 20% by year 5 and 50% by year 10. BIOADAPTADOR RCT outcomes at 12 months have shown the safety and efficacy of DynamX Bioadaptor, establishing new reference parameters in arterial viability restoration.

EuroPCR 2024

The aim of this study was to report clinical outcomes at 2 years and to confirm outcomes with imaging showing hemodynamic restauration assessed with IVUS/OCT/QCA. Primary end point was non-inferiority target vessel failure.

The study looked at 445 patients, 223 were randomized to DynamX Bioadaptor and 222 to RESOLUTE ONYX. Mean age was 67 and they were mostly men. The most common clinical presentation was stable angina, and the anterior descending was the most affected artery. Around 23% of patients presented compromised bifurcations and nearly 20% had obstructions with moderate to severe calcification.

Read also: EuroPCR 2024 | Specific Intracoronary Tests Combined with Angiography for Diagnosing Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome: The AID-ANGIO Study.

TLF at 1 year resulted 1.8% for the DynamX Bioadaptor group and 2.8% for the RESOLUTE ONYX (p<0.001 for non-inferiority). At 2 year followup, there was significant reduction of TLF in 59% (2.3% DynamX vs 5.5% RESOLUTE, HR=0.41, p=0.093). This reduction is owed to lower incidence of cardiovascular death, target vessel related MI and clinically driven target vessel revascularization.

Conclusion 

The DynamX Bioadaptor, with its innovative design and action mechanism, restores hemodynamic modulation and offers a significant clinical benefit, establishing a new therapy and a new standard of treatment for patients with coronary artery disease.

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: BIOADAPTOR RCT– 2-Year Outcomes Randomized Controlled Trial of Sirolimus-Eluting Bioadaptor Versus Zotarolimus-Eluting Drug-Eluting Stent.

Reference: Shigeru Saito MD et al. 


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

ACC 2025 | FLAVOUR II: Angiography-Derived FFR-Guided vs. IVUS-Guided PCI

Physiological assessment is effective when it comes to decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite the available evidence, its use remains limited. AngioFFR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...