EuroPCR 2024 | NOTION-2: TAVI vs SAVR, Randomized Study on Low-Risk Young Patients with Severe Tricuspid Disease or Bicuspid Stenosis

Many of the studies comparing TAVR against SAVR in low risk patients included patients between 70-75 years, excluding those with tricuspid valves. 

EuroPCR 2024

This study included low surgical risk patients with severe aortic stenosis and symptoms, 75 years or younger. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receiving TAVR or SAVR, stratified according to sex, need for new revascularization and presence of bicuspid or tricuspid valves. 

Primary end point at one year was a composite of death, stroke, or rehospitalization (procedure, cardiac failure or valve failure related). Secondary end points included death or disabling stroke, major bleeding, new atrial fibrillation, need for pacemaker implantation, aortic valve performance (gradient and paravalvular leak) and functional parameters such as functional class.

370 patients were enrolled, mean age 71.1 years, average STS 1.1, and 26% had bicuspid valves (mainly type 1). Primary end point showed a non-significant difference in events (with higher trend in TAVR) (10.2% vs 7.1%; HR 1.4, CI 95% 0.7-2.9; P=0.3). Neither were there significant differences in death and disabling stroke (3.2% vs 1.6%; HR 2.0, CI 95% 0.5-7.8; P=0.3).

Read also: EuroPCR 2024 | CALIPSO: CTO vs Angiography Guided Treatment of Calcified Lesions.

As regards secondary end points, TAVR patients showed lower bleeding (HR 0.3; P≤0.001), lower incidence of atrial fibrillation (HR 0.1; P≤0.001) and less mismatch (HR 0.5; P=0.02), but showed higher rates of pacemaker implantation (HR 2; P=0.03) and paravalvular leak (P=0.005).

Bicuspid valve patient sub-analysis revealed a significant increase in primary end point incidence (14.3% vs 3.9%; HR 3.8, CI 95% 1.8-18.5; P=0.07). When looking at individual end points, SAVR presented fewer events. 

The authors have concluded that TAVR and SAVR are equivalent in young patients when it comes to the composite event. However, results were less favorable for TAVR in patients with bicuspid valves. 

Dr. Omar Tupayachi

Dr. Omar Tupayachi.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Reference: Presented by Ole De Backer at Late-Breaking Clinical Trials, EuroPCR 2024, May 14-17, Paris, France.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

TRILUMINATE: Liver and Kidney Failure in Tricuspid Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair

Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) will affect roughly 3% of the 65+ population and may lead to liver and kidney failure, which will cause ascites...

Secondary Access in TAVI: Is Transradial Approach our Best Bet?

In some countries, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the treatment of choice for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Primary transfemoral access...

Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis: A Complex Decision

Asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis continues to pose a significant challenge when it comes to clinical decision-making, often due to the difficulty in identifying symptoms....

TAVI and Aortic Regurgitation: Are All Valves the Same?

Aortic regurgitation (AR) accounts for 0.5- 2.2% of all cases of valve disease in individuals over 65 years old. According to current guidelines, surgery is...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TRILUMINATE: Liver and Kidney Failure in Tricuspid Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair

Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) will affect roughly 3% of the 65+ population and may lead to liver and kidney failure, which will cause ascites...

Secondary Access in TAVI: Is Transradial Approach our Best Bet?

In some countries, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the treatment of choice for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Primary transfemoral access...

FAVOR III Europa Sub-Analysis: Coronary Revascularization Deferral Based On QFR vs FFR

When it comes to intermediate coronary lesion revascularization decision making, functional assessment is the recommended. At present, several indices are used, such as fractional...