TCT 2024 – ECLIPSE: Randomized Study of Orbital Atherectomy vs Conventional PCI in Severely Calcified Lesions

Coronary calcification is associated with stent under-expansion and increased risk of both early and late adverse events. Atherectomy is an essential tool for uncrossable or non-dilatable lesions, as it allows for calcium ablation or fracturing. 

TCT 2024 | Utilización de balones cubiertos de fármacos para el tratamiento de la rama lateral en técnica de stent provisional

The ECLIPSE study, a randomized trial, compared orbital atherectomy (OA) with balloon angioplasty (including cutting and scoring balloons) for the treatment of severely calcified lesions before drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation.

This study included patients with chronic and acute coronary syndromes (without ST elevation) and de novo lesions with severe calcification, as determined by angiography or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)/optical coherence tomography (OCT), where plaque preparation was feasible with either therapy. 

A total of 2005 patients were enrolled across 104 US centers. Randomization was 1:1. The primary endpoints were (1) imaging analysis assessing minimal stent area (MSA) post-PCI, and (2) target vessel failure (TVF) at one year.

The average participant age was 69.9 years; 73.6% of subjects were men, and 23% had chronic kidney disease.

Read also: TCT 2024 | PEERLESS: Mechanical Thrombectomy with FlowTriever vs Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in Intermediate Risk PTE.

In terms of the procedure, 47.6% of the orbital atherectomy group was treated via transfemoral access, 4.6% required a temporary pacemaker, 21.4% needed an extension catheter, and 42% used an OTW microcatheter or balloon. Intravascular imaging was used in 62.1% of procedures (40.3% of cases used OCT and 25.6%, IVUS).

In an analysis of the complications, there were low rates of no-reflow (0.3% vs 0.1%), type C-F dissections (6.9% vs 6.3%), and perforations (1.8% vs 1%, mostly Ellis type III). The incidence of slow flow was higher in the OA group (1.4% vs 0.4%; p=0.03). 

MSA in the most calcified region was 7.44 vs 7.05, a non-significant difference (-0.26 mm²; p=0.08). Regarding TVF at 1 year, orbital atherectomy showed an incidence of 11.5% vs 10.0% (hazard ratio [HR] 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-1.54; p=0.28). 

Read also: TCT 2024 | Use of Drug-Coated Balloons for Side Branch Treatment in Provisional Stenting.

Regarding secondary endpoints, the OA group had higher cardiovascular mortality (p=0.005) and both groups had a similar stent thrombosis rate (0.7% vs 0.3%).

The authors concluded that routine use of orbital atherectomy did not improve MSA or reduce TVF compared with balloon PCI.

Presented by Ajay J Kirtane in the Late-Breaking Trials Sessions, TCT 2024, October 27-29, Washington, USA.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

ACC 2025 | FLAVOUR II: Angiography-Derived FFR-Guided vs. IVUS-Guided PCI

Physiological assessment is effective when it comes to decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite the available evidence, its use remains limited. AngioFFR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...