TCT 2024 – ECLIPSE: Randomized Study of Orbital Atherectomy vs Conventional PCI in Severely Calcified Lesions

Coronary calcification is associated with stent under-expansion and increased risk of both early and late adverse events. Atherectomy is an essential tool for uncrossable or non-dilatable lesions, as it allows for calcium ablation or fracturing. 

TCT 2024 | Utilización de balones cubiertos de fármacos para el tratamiento de la rama lateral en técnica de stent provisional

The ECLIPSE study, a randomized trial, compared orbital atherectomy (OA) with balloon angioplasty (including cutting and scoring balloons) for the treatment of severely calcified lesions before drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation.

This study included patients with chronic and acute coronary syndromes (without ST elevation) and de novo lesions with severe calcification, as determined by angiography or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)/optical coherence tomography (OCT), where plaque preparation was feasible with either therapy. 

A total of 2005 patients were enrolled across 104 US centers. Randomization was 1:1. The primary endpoints were (1) imaging analysis assessing minimal stent area (MSA) post-PCI, and (2) target vessel failure (TVF) at one year.

The average participant age was 69.9 years; 73.6% of subjects were men, and 23% had chronic kidney disease.

Read also: TCT 2024 | PEERLESS: Mechanical Thrombectomy with FlowTriever vs Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in Intermediate Risk PTE.

In terms of the procedure, 47.6% of the orbital atherectomy group was treated via transfemoral access, 4.6% required a temporary pacemaker, 21.4% needed an extension catheter, and 42% used an OTW microcatheter or balloon. Intravascular imaging was used in 62.1% of procedures (40.3% of cases used OCT and 25.6%, IVUS).

In an analysis of the complications, there were low rates of no-reflow (0.3% vs 0.1%), type C-F dissections (6.9% vs 6.3%), and perforations (1.8% vs 1%, mostly Ellis type III). The incidence of slow flow was higher in the OA group (1.4% vs 0.4%; p=0.03). 

MSA in the most calcified region was 7.44 vs 7.05, a non-significant difference (-0.26 mm²; p=0.08). Regarding TVF at 1 year, orbital atherectomy showed an incidence of 11.5% vs 10.0% (hazard ratio [HR] 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-1.54; p=0.28). 

Read also: TCT 2024 | Use of Drug-Coated Balloons for Side Branch Treatment in Provisional Stenting.

Regarding secondary endpoints, the OA group had higher cardiovascular mortality (p=0.005) and both groups had a similar stent thrombosis rate (0.7% vs 0.3%).

The authors concluded that routine use of orbital atherectomy did not improve MSA or reduce TVF compared with balloon PCI.

Presented by Ajay J Kirtane in the Late-Breaking Trials Sessions, TCT 2024, October 27-29, Washington, USA.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

ACC 2026 | DKCRUSH VIII: IVUS or angiography to guide PCI in complex coronary bifurcations

Intracoronary imaging guidance has become an established recommended strategy in complex coronary lesions. In the specific setting of complex bifurcations, uncertainty remained regarding the...

ACC 2026 | OPTIMAL: IVUS Guidance in PCI of the Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is considered an equivalent alternative to coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis and...

ACC 2026 | IVUS-CHIP Trial: Intravascular ultrasound–guided versus angiography-guided complex PCI

Optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions remains a relevant clinical challenge. In this context, the IVUS-CHIP trial was designed to evaluate...

ACC 2026 | ALL-RISE Trial: Coronary Physiological Assessment Using FFRangio

Coronary physiological assessment using pressure-wire techniques (FFR/iFR) carries a Class IA recommendation in ACC/AHA guidelines; however, its use remains limited due to factors such...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Therapeutic strategies in carotid free-floating thrombus: evidence and controversies

Carotid free-floating thrombus (cFFT) is a rare entity with a high embolic risk, associated with acute neurological events such as stroke or transient ischemic...

The Two Sides of the Coin: What Do CHAMPION-AF and CLOSURE-AF Teach Us About Left Atrial Appendage Closure?

Letter to the editor: Juan Manuel Pérez Asorey Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAO) is currently going through one of the most interesting stages of...

CLOSURE-AF: Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure versus Medical Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure has been proposed as an alternative to anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation and high bleeding risk; however, comparative...