Nonobstructive Coronary Lesions and Ventricular Dysfunction

Many patients arrive to the cath lab for a diagnostic coronary angiography after an echo showing severe ventricular dysfunction, even in asymptomatic patients. In many occasions, their coronary arteries are normal, and in many others, we find coronary disease that is not enough to warrant such severe ventricular dysfunction.

Double Kissing Crush vs. Provisional Stenting

Patients with heart failure are frequently divided according to aetiology in ischemic and nonischemic. However, such binary classification combines patients with normal coronary arteries and patients with nonobstructive disease who might have a different prognosis.

This study divided patients with ventricular dysfunction into those with normal coronary arteries, nonobstructive disease, and obstructive disease.

The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal infarction, nonfatal stroke, and heart failure hospitalization.


Read also: The First Antidote Against Ticagrelor Is a Rapid-Acting, Extended Effect Agent in Preliminary Results.


Of 12,814 patients, 2656 (20.7%) had normal coronary arteries, 2254 (17.6%) had nonobstructive disease, and 7904 (61.7%) had obstructive disease.

The risk of the primary endpoint was significantly higher in the nonobstructive group (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04 to 1.32; p = 0.01) compared with the group with normal coronary arteries.


Read also: Patients: What They Really Want to Know about Their Disease.


Nonobstructive coronary artery disease was associated with an increase in cardiovascular death (HR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.27 to 2.62; p = 0.001) and all-cause mortality (HR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.33; p = 0.005). Still, there were no differences as regards acute myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart failure hospitalization.

Conclusion

Among patients with left ventricular dysfunction, the presence of nonobstructive coronary artery disease was independently associated with an increase in composite events and mortality.

Original title: Importance of Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease in the Prognosis of Patients With Heart Failure.

Reference: Juarez R. Braga et al. J Am Coll Cardiol HF 2019, article in press.

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

ACC 2025 | FLAVOUR II: Angiography-Derived FFR-Guided vs. IVUS-Guided PCI

Physiological assessment is effective when it comes to decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite the available evidence, its use remains limited. AngioFFR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...