REPRISE II: results obtained with the new valve according to VARC criteria

The objective was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Lotus Valve System to treat patients with severe aortic stenosis and high surgical risk. The study included 60 patients who received the device and were followed during 30 days. Mortality from all causes was 1.7% and the incidence of stroke was 8.6%, with half of these being of disabling nature. According to the VARC criteria, the successful implantation rate of the device was 100%. 

Conclusion: This device was successfully implanted in all patients, with a low 30-day mortality rate. No valve embolization or inadequate implantation was observed. The rate of clinical events is similar to the one showed by other valves.

ian_meredith_europcr
Ian T. Meredith, MBBS, PHD
2013-05-22

Original title: Repositionable percutaneous replacement of a stenotic aortic valve throughimplantation of the Lotus Valve System: 30-day outcomes for the first60 patients in the REPRISE II study

More articles by this author

DEFLECT I: cerebral protection device in TAVI

Strokes after TAVI occur in between 3.8 and 6.7% of the cases, with new MRI lesions being almost the rule. The TriGuard EDD device...

DISCOVER: new low profile valve with little post-implant regurgitation

The objective of the study was to assess events after 30 days with the DirectFLOW Medical Valve device in patients with severe aortic stenosis...

JUPITER: transapical TAVI device

We evaluated 88 consecutive patients (at this phase) with severe aortic stenosis who received the second-generation device for transapical access. Survival at thirty days...

PROTAVI-C: Embolic protection during TAVI

Percutaneous aortic valve replacement (TAVI) is a new treatment option for patients that are inoperable or present a high surgical risk. Some studies have...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2026 | ALL-RISE Trial: Coronary Physiological Assessment Using FFRangio

Coronary physiological assessment using pressure-wire techniques (FFR/iFR) carries a Class IA recommendation in ACC/AHA guidelines; however, its use remains limited due to factors such...

ACC 2026 | Protect The Head-To-Head Trial: Randomized Comparison Between Emboliner and Sentinel During TAVI

Ischemic stroke remains one of the most feared complications of TAVI, with a relatively low but persistent incidence of 2–4%, without significant reduction over...

ACC 2026 | PRO-TAVI Trial: Deferring Coronary Angioplasty in Patients Undergoing TAVI

Coronary artery disease is common in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI. Current guidelines recommend considering revascularization in significant coronary lesions, particularly in...