Post PCI FFR Reduces MACE

Original Title: Utilizing Post-Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve to Optimize Acute Results and the Relationship to Long-Term Outcomes

Reference: Shiv K. Agarwal, et al. JACC Cardiovascular Intervention 2016;9:1022-31

 

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

 

FFR post PCIFractional flow reserve has shown benefits and it is considered the gold standard to assess intermediate lesions (Class IA), but its use post PCI has not been evaluated yet.

574 patients with 664 lesions were analyzed; 45% had a history of diabetes, 48% multivessel disease and 45% diffuse disease.

Previous obstruction degree by quantitative angiography was 73±15%, 96% with FFR ≤0.80 and 73% FFR ≤0.75, regardless adenosine administration technique.

After PCI with angiographically satisfactory results, 21% (143 lesions) presented a suboptimal FFR ≤0.80 (0.75±0.05). After a second intervention to this group (post balloon dilation, subsequent stent implantation, or IVUS or OCT lesion assessment) FFR increased to 0.87±0.06 (p<0.0001). 9% continued with suboptimal FFR.

This was associated to longer procedural and fluoroscopy time, but not with more contrast.

Follow up was at 31 months with 19% of patients presenting some event (62 death by any cause, 12 MI, and 60 revascularizations).

MACE predictors were ACS, diffuse lesions and ≤0.86 final FFR.

In ROC curve analyzis, final FFR cutoff value predictor of MACE was ≤0.86 (23% vs. 17% p=0.02), for death ≤0.87 (13.5% vs. 9% p=0.03) and TVR ≤0.85 (12% vs. 8% p=0.03).

Conclusion

Post PCI FFR reclassifies 20% of PCI with satisfactory results, requiring more intervention to achieve complete functional revascularization at the time of index procedure. Post PCI FFR is an independent predictor of long term evolution.

Editorial Comment

This analyzis shows the concept of PCI “Functional Optimization”, because 20% of patients present ischemia after a satisfactory angiography.

Ideally, we should identify the groups that could benefit from this strategy in order not to unnecessarily prolong procedures and to save costs.

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava. Favaloro Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

We value your opinion. You are more than welcome to leave your comments, thoughts, questions or any ideas here below.

More articles by this author

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...

Dual-Prep Registry: Atherectomy and IVL for Severe Coronary Calcification

Severe coronary calcification remains one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although rotational or orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)...

Prehospital heparin in STEMI: A safe strategy associated with improved early reperfusion

Early reperfusion remains the main prognostic determinant in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment...

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...

Dual-Prep Registry: Atherectomy and IVL for Severe Coronary Calcification

Severe coronary calcification remains one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although rotational or orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)...