When to Intervene a Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis?

When to Intervene a Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis

Guidelines recommend that carotid endarterectomy be performed within two weeks of stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis.

 

Because a Swedish registry study showed patients treated within the first days after a transient ischemic attack or stroke are at increased risk of death and perioperatory stroke, this study aims at verifying this risk in another series of patients in Germany.

 

It included 56,336 elective carotid endarterectomies performed in patients with symptomatic stenosis between 2009 and 2014. The overall population was divided in four cohorts according to time interval between index event and surgery.

Cohort 1: 0 to 2 days.

Cohort 2: 3 to 7 days.

Cohort 3: 8 to 14 days.

Cohort 4: 14 to 180 days.

 

Primary end point was stroke or inhospital death. A multilevel multivariable regression model was used for risk adjusted analyzis, given the differences between cohorts.

 

With a mean age of 71.1±9.6 years and 67.5% men, the overall rate of any stroke or death was 2.5% (n=1.434).

 

Risk of any inhospital stroke or death was:

  • 3% for the group intervened within 48 hours of index event
  • 2.5% for the group intervened between days 3 and 7
  • 2.6% for the group intervened between days 7 and 14
  • 2.3% for those intervened between days 14 and 180

 

At multivariable analyzis, the study showed the time of intervention was not significantly associated to events.

 

Even though this study does not assess recurrent events in patients awaiting intervention, but only inhospital events post procedure, we are well aware patients are a high risk of events and, therefore, early intervention is recommended.

 

Historically, early intervention has been resisted by surgeons, because of the supposedly high periprocedural events rate. Mostly, they have tried to “cool the case down”.

 

Conclusion

A shorter time interval between index event and carotid endarterectomy was not associated with an increased risk of peri-procedural events such as death or stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis.

 

Original Title: Short Time Interval Between Neurologic Event and Carotid Surgery Is Not Associated With an Increased Procedural Risk.

Reference: Pavlos Tsantilas et al. Stroke. 2016 Oct 13. Epub ahead of print.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

New Carotid PCI All-in-One System

Carotid stenting is equivalent to carotid endarterectomy in terms of major adverse events (death, AMI, and stroke). However, it entails higher risk of minor...

PERFORMANCE II Trial: Safety and Efficacy of the New NeuroGuard Carotid Stent System

The percutaneous treatment of carotid artery disease through stenting (CAS) for the prevention of cerebrovascular disease has proven to be an effective alternative compared...

Trends in the Treatment of Critical Lower Limb Ischemia

Approximately 25% of patients with critical lower limb ischemia (CLLI) face amputation within the first year after diagnosis (according to statistics from the United...

Endovascular Treatment of Iliofemoral Disease for the Improvement of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a significant risk factor in the development of difficult-to-treat conditions, such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TAVR in Bicuspid Valves: Higher Prosthesis Mismatch?

TAVR indication is steadily advancing onto younger, lower risk patients.  The presence of bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) has been observed in 0.5% to 2% of...

ROLLER COASTR-EPIC22: Comparison of Plaque Modification Techniques in Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions

The presence of coronary calcium significantly limits the success of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), primarily due to suboptimal stent expansion. This can lead to...

Edge-to-Edge Repair in Central and Non-Central Mitral Regurgitation

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common condition, with approximately 3.5% prevalence in individuals under 65, increasing to 7.7% in those over 75. It can...