NCDR ACTION Registry: Anticoagulated Patients with No Higher Risk of Bleeding in Emergency Procedures

Patients with a history of atrial fibrillation treated with warfarin or any of the new direct oral anticoagulants undergoing acute myocardial infarction do not present higher risk of bleeding when receiving angiography or angioplasty. In fact, this subgroup of anticoagulated patients showed lower in-hospital mortality than the control group.

NCDR ACTION Registry: los pacientes anticoagulados no tienen mayor riesgo de sangrado en los procedimientos de urgencia

After analyzing 6471 patients undergoing ST elevation MI and 19954 patients undergoing non-ST elevation MI included in the ACTION registry, it was observed 71.3% of atrial fibrillation patients do not receive anticoagulants, 15.7% receive warfarin and 13% receive one of the new anticoagulants (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban o dabigatran).

 

There were no significant differences in bleeding risk between patients on anticoagulants and no anticoagulants patients. In addition, this was true for both STEMI and NSTEMI patients.


Read also: FOURIER: Evolocumab Found Beneficial for Patients with Peripheral Vascular Disease of Prior MI”.


The use of warfarin was associated with a 22% reduction of in-hospital death and direct oral anticoagulants with a 39% reduction (both compared against no anticoagulation).

 

Original title: Management and outcomes of myocardial infarction in the age of direct oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation: a report from the NCDR ACTION Registry-GWTG.

Reference: Feldman DN et al. American Heart Association 2017 Scientific Sessions. November 12, 2017.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...