ACC 2018 | Flu Vaccination Reduces Mortality in Heart Failure Hospitalizations

Heart failure patients vaccinated against influenza are at a significantly lower risk of dying, both during flu season and outside of it.

Patients with heart failure vaccinated had a 48% lower risk of death during influenza season and a 21% lower risk during the rest of the year.

Dr. Fukuta, lead investigator in this study, explained that flu vaccination of heart failure patients in Japan is not formally recommended. Larger-scale and adequately powered randomized controlled trials, such as INVESTED, will provide a definitive answer.

At the moment, with some inconsistent results, we must settle for this meta-analysis led by Dr. Fukuta, which includes 5 observational studies involving a total of 78,882 patients with heart failure. The age of patients ranged from 64 to 75 years old, and study follow-up was between 1 and 4 years.


Read also: ACC 2018 | Risk of MI in Non-Cardiac Surgeries.


There are physiopathologic reasons supporting vaccination, such as the fact that respiratory infections (including influenza) are the precipitating cause of heart failure and are associated with increased mortality. If vaccination reduces the incidence and/or severity of these respiratory infections, it will prevent heart failure exacerbations, hospitalization, and associated mortality.

Furthermore, vaccination reduces the risk of cardiovascular events, including infarction and unstable angina, in patients with coronary artery disease. There are studies showing a sixfold higher risk of infarction in the week after a flu diagnosis. In such cases, physiopathology is probably related to inflammation.

Original title: The Effect of Influenza Vaccination on Mortality and Hospitalization in Patients with Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis.

Presenter: Fukuta H.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...

Cardiac Remodeling After Percutaneous ASD Closure: Should It Be Immediate or Progressive?

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common congenital heart disease that generates a left-to-right shunt, leading to right-side chamber overload and a risk of...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...