ESC 2018 | ASCEND: Aspirin for Primary Prevention in Diabetic Patients Fails the Cost-Benefit Analysis

The obvious risk of bleeding posed by aspirin was too clear in this work, casting a shadow of doubt over the indication of aspirin for primary prevention in diabetic patients.

ASCEND: Aspirina para prevención primaria en diabéticos no pasa el costo/beneficioAccording to the ASCEND trial, presented at the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2018 Congress and simultaneously published in NEJM, aspirin reduces cardiovascular events as primary prevention, but the cost in terms of major bleeding is too high to support its use in this setting.

 

Over a 7.4-year follow-up, aspirin reduced major cardiovascular events, from 9.6% in placebo-treated patients to 8.5% in aspirin-treated patients (odds ratio [OR]: 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79-0.97). However, aspirin treatment raised the risk of major bleeding from 3.2% in placebo-treated patients to 4.1% in aspirin-treated patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.09-1.52).


Read also: ESC 2018 | MARINER: Rivaroxaban as Thromboprophylaxis after Hospitalization.


There was no patient subgroup in which the benefits clearly outweighed the risks. Furthermore, aspirin did not reduce the occurrence of any type of cancer during the follow-up period, contrary to what had been observed in the earliest (and oldest) studies with this drug.

 

Most of the 15,480 patients included in the trial had their other risk factors well managed, with high rates of statin and antihypertensive use, good glycemic control, and a low rate of smoking. All of this may have been key as regards the difference with early works.

 

The results of this work will surely have an impact on both sides of the Atlantic, since the 2015 American guidelines (from the American Heart Association [AHA] and the American Diabetes Association) recommend aspirin as a reasonable treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes (unless contraindicated).


Read also: ESC 2018 | FRANCE-TAVI: Atrial Fibrillation and Anticoagulation Associated to Mortality in TAVR.


In contrast, the 2016 European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention contain a class III recommendation against the use of antiplatelet therapy (including aspirin) in patients with diabetes and no history of cardiovascular disease.

 

The ASCEND trial had a 2×2 factorial design and included patients 40 and older with diabetes and no evidence of cardiovascular disease at baseline. Patients were randomized to enteric-coated aspirin 100 mg daily vs. placebo and to supplementation with 1-g capsules of omega 3 or placebo.

 

Original title: Effects of Aspirin for Primary Prevention in Persons with Diabetes Mellitus.

Reference: Presented by Jane Armitage at the European Society of Cardiology 2018 Congress and simultaneously published in N Engl J Med. 2018;Epub ahead of print.

 

ASCEND


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

AHA 2025 | DAPT-MVD: Extended DAPT vs. Aspirin Monotherapy After PCI in Multivessel Disease

In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who remain stable 12 months after drug-eluting stent (DES) stenting, there is uncertainty as to prolonging dual...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....