AHA 2018 | New Physical Activity Guidelines Recommend Movement for All Ages

The new 2018 physical activity guidelines continue to recommend the same amount of physical activity (300 minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity per week or 150 minutes of vigorous-intensity physical activity), but they have changed which adults can carry out this moderate- and vigorous-intensity physical activity. Additionally, instead of recommending a target number of minutes of exercise per week, they simply encourage people to move more and sit less.

Nuevas guías de actividad física ponen en movimiento a todas las edadesEverybody can improve their health dramatically by simply moving. At any time, in any place, and with any activity.

 

Physical inactivity accounts for 10% of premature deaths in the United States. If just one-quarter of the people who do not carry out physical activity started moving, this would prevent 75,000 deaths each year in the US and 1,300,000 deaths worldwide.

 

According to the most recent estimates, just 26% of men, 19% of women, and 20% of adolescents get enough physical activity per week.


Read also: AHA 2018 | Endocarditis Prophylaxis More Limited after AHA 2007 Guidelines.


The main investigator for this study went so far as to comment that the lack of physical activity is a matter of national security because obesity disqualifies nearly one-third of the American population, aged 17 to 24 years, from military service.

 

Original title: The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans.

Reference: Percy KL et al. JAMA. 2018; Epub ahead of print.

 

guías-actividad-física


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....