Is There a Relationship between ARBs, ACE 2 Inhibitors and COVID-19?

In the past few days, many doctors appear to have caught wind of somewhat unfounded data. According to this information, the novel COVID-19 would use angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors to enter cells and, in this context, patients with an upregulated expression of these receptors (such as patients receiving angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) might be more susceptible to infection. 

Recomendaciones de la ACC con el nuevo coronavirus

This would explain the fact that hypertension, diabetes and cardiac failure patients are considered a high-risk population, seeing as they most likely receive some of these drugs.  

It is important to recommend caution with the information we read when being “bombarded” with data with little to no time to check sources. 

This is why the ACC, the AHA and the Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA) have jointly published this document to cut these speculations in the bud.

COVID-19 patients receiving ACE inhibitors or ARBs must not stop treatment, unless indicated by their physician. 


Read also: Cath Lab Management Protocol for the COVID-19 Outbreak.


There are obvious concerns, since it has become clear that our patients are at higher risk of developing major complications (even death) by this infection. All the same, after extensive revision, the three societies agree there is no evidence to discontinue ACE inhibitors or ARBs.

Original Title: HFSA/ACC/AHA statement addresses concerns re: using RAAS antagonists in COVID-19.

Reference: Bozkurt B et al. 


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Therapeutic strategies in carotid free-floating thrombus: evidence and controversies

Carotid free-floating thrombus (cFFT) is a rare entity with a high embolic risk, associated with acute neurological events such as stroke or transient ischemic...

ACC 2026 | DKCRUSH VIII: IVUS or angiography to guide PCI in complex coronary bifurcations

Intracoronary imaging guidance has become an established recommended strategy in complex coronary lesions. In the specific setting of complex bifurcations, uncertainty remained regarding the...

ACC 2026 | OPTIMAL: IVUS Guidance in PCI of the Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is considered an equivalent alternative to coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis and...

ACC 2026 | SirPAD Trial: Sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty in infrainguinal arterial disease

Paclitaxel-coated balloons have demonstrated improved patency in peripheral arterial disease (PAD), although questions remain regarding safety and applicability across different vascular territories. In this...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Therapeutic strategies in carotid free-floating thrombus: evidence and controversies

Carotid free-floating thrombus (cFFT) is a rare entity with a high embolic risk, associated with acute neurological events such as stroke or transient ischemic...

The Two Sides of the Coin: What Do CHAMPION-AF and CLOSURE-AF Teach Us About Left Atrial Appendage Closure?

Letter to the editor: Juan Manuel Pérez Asorey Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAO) is currently going through one of the most interesting stages of...

CLOSURE-AF: Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure versus Medical Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure has been proposed as an alternative to anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation and high bleeding risk; however, comparative...