Post-MI Colchicine: Cost-Effective with Good Results

Low colchicine doses reduce the risk of post-AMI ischemic events according to the COLCOT trial, originally presented at AHA 2019 scientific sessions, and simultaneously published in NEJM. The new information delivered at the virtual ACC 2020 addresses its cost-effectiveness.

Colchicina post infarto: buenos resultados y costo-efectivo

Colchicine is an anti-inflammatory drug indicated in the treatment of gout and pericarditis, but its price skyrocketed last year, at least in the US, after the COLCOT came out. 

The inflammatory theory has been looked into for years now, in the context of CAD.  The concept had often been tested with costly monoclonal antibodies and, since last year, the effect was finally achieved with a drug worth cents. 

The new analysis presented at the virtual ACC 2020 carries out a cost model for a 20-year period (for a lifetime in patients after their first MI). 

Los colchicine doses in addition to optimal medical treatment after a MI reduce healthcare costs by 47% for the in-trial period, and by 69% when we consider the rest of a patient’s life. 

Original Title: Cost-effectiveness of low-dose colchicine after myocardial infarction in the COLchicine Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial (COLCOT).

Reference: Samuel M et al. ACC 2020 virtual.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....