ESC 2020 | Acute Myocardial Infarction and Anemia: Are Transfusions Necessary?

In anemic patients undergoing acute myocardial infarction, a restrictive transfusion strategy is as safe as a more liberal approach, in addition to saving costs. The cutoff value to decide for a transfusion would be < 8 g/dl hemoglobin.

Infarto agudo y anemia ¿es necesaria la transfusión?

The REALITY outcomes were presented during the virtual ESC 2020 sessions.

Anemia is relatively common in patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction (between 5 and 10%).

There are prior randomized studies comparing different strategies in the context of surgery or gastrointestinal bleeding, but patients undergoing MI have historically been excluded.

The REALITY was carried out in France and Spain, it included 630 patients undergoing acute myocardial infarction with hemoglobin between 7 and 10 gr/dl during hospitalization. 

It randomized patients to a restrictive strategy (cutoff <8 gr/dl with a target between 8 and 10 gr/dl) or a more liberal approach (cutoff <10 gr/dl with a target >11 gr/dl).


Read also: ESC 2020 | Revascularization Strategies: Ventricular Dysfunction Might Tilt the Scales.


These strategies were maintained until discharge or 30 days (whatever happened first).

Regardless the strategy, transfusion was allowed in cases of active bleeding, if a significant drop was expected, one that rendered a blood test redundant, or when patients went into shock. 

With the restrictive strategy, 35.7% of patients received at least one transfusion compared against 86.7% of the liberal strategy.


Read also: ESC 2020 | Dapagliflozin in Kidney Failure: The Drug Continues to Conquer Other Territories.


Safety also resulted identical between the groups, but those in the restrictive arm showed fewer infections (0% vs 1.5%) and less pulmonary injury (0.3% vs 2.2%; p=0.03 for both).

The combined primary end point (death, repeat MI, stroke and emergency revascularization) resulted 11% for the restrictive strategy vs. 14% for the conservative.

The restrictive strategy also saved costs and hospital resources.

Original Title: REALITY – a randomized trial of transfusion strategies in patients with myocardial infarction and anemia: 30-day results.

Reference: Steg PG et al. Presentado en forma virtual en ESC 2020.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...

Dual-Prep Registry: Atherectomy and IVL for Severe Coronary Calcification

Severe coronary calcification remains one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although rotational or orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)...

Prehospital heparin in STEMI: A safe strategy associated with improved early reperfusion

Early reperfusion remains the main prognostic determinant in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment...

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...

Dual-Prep Registry: Atherectomy and IVL for Severe Coronary Calcification

Severe coronary calcification remains one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although rotational or orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)...