Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in ST Elevation MI

In patients undergoing ST elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) receiving primary PCI, no significative differences between prasugrel and ticagrelor were found. However, the latter was associated to a significantly higher number of repeat MI when considered separately. 

ticagrelor vs. aspirina

Few studies have compared the efficacy and safety of the two most potent oral P2Y12 receptor inhibitors in STEMI patients undergoing PCI. There is a large body of evidence resulting from studies comparing each of them separately vs clopidogrel, but not against each other. 

This analysis prespecified in the ISAR REACT-5 protocol included 1653 STEMI patients randomized to ticagrelor or prasugrel.

The primary end point was a composite of death, MI and stroke at one year after randomization. The secondary end point was the incidence of major bleeding (BARC 3 to 5) for the same period. 

The combined end point occurred in 10.1% of patients in the ticagrelor group vs 7.9% of prasugrel patients (p=0.10). When considering its separate components, they observed similar results in death (4.9% vs 4.7%, p=0.83) and stroke (1.3% vs 1%, p=0.46), as well as definite thrombosis (1.8% vs 1%, p=0.15). 


Read also: TCT 2020 | Ticagrelor Monotherapy After ST-Segment Elevation Infarction.


The difference in new events rate was significant, prasugrel winning with 2.8% against 5.3% of ticagrelor (p=0.010). This difference tends to disappear with all events combined. 

Major bleeding rates according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC 3 to 5) were practically identical with 6.1% for ticagrelor and 5.1% for prasugrel (p=0.36).

Conclusion

In STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI there were no differences in the combined primary end point between ticagrelor and prasugrel. When considering MI separately, prasugrel has an advantage. 

Original Title: Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients with ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Reference: Alp Aytekin et al. Circulation. 2020, Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050244.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...