Should Total Occlusion Influence on Revascularization Strategy?

Success or failure of total occlusion (TO) revascularization does not affect mortality at 10 years, and this does not depend on revascularization strategy (PCI vs surgery) or location. 

 estrategia de revascularización

The long-term clinical benefit of recanalization and PCI or TO artery bypass graft remains nuclear. 

This is a sub-study of the SYNTAXES (Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery Extended Survival) that randomized patients with at least one TO. 

Of 1800 patients randomized to PCI vs surgery, 460 presented at least one TO.

TO revascularization, or its absence, did not affect mortality at 10 years, regardless the strategy (PCI Branch: 29.9% vs. 29.4%; p = 0.982 and surgery branch: 28.0% vs. 21.4%; p = 0.330).


Read also: Major Cause of Myocardial Injury by COVID-19.


Neither were there differences between recanalization or revascularization if TO was to the left main or to the anterior descending artery (34.5% vs. 26.9%; p = 0.837). 

Conclusion

Recanalization with PCI or revascularization with surgery of a total occlusion does not affect mortality at 10 years, irrespective of strategy type or TO location. 

These data support the contemporary practice claiming recanalization should be offered in specialized high-volume centers to patients with angina refractory to optimal medical treatment and with confirmed myocardial viability. 

Original Title: Mortality 10 Years After Percutaneous or Surgical Revascularization in Patients With Total Coronary Artery Occlusions.

Reference: Hideyuki Kawashima et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Feb 9;77(5):529-540. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.055.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....