Biodegradable Polymer Myth Also Debunked for ACSs

During TCT 2020 a preview of the results of the comparison of drug-eluting stents (DES) with biodegradable-polymer vs. durable-polymer in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was presented. The fine print and the final paper for HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS are now published, and they lower the expectations set on biodegradable polymers.

mito del polímero degradable

In patients with ACS undergoing angioplasty, biodegradable-polymer stents barely reached non-inferiority vs. durable-polymer stents after one year follow-up.

The patient-oriented primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, non-fatal infarction, and any repeat revascularization at 12 months.

The device-oriented secondary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel infarction, or target-lesion revascularization.

Overall, 3413 patients were randomized to receive a durable-polymer DES (1713) or a biodegradable-polymer DES (1700).

The patient-oriented primary endpoint reached non-inferiority with 5.2% for durable-polymer DES and 6.4% for biodegradable DES (pnoninferiority < 0.001).


Read also: SCOPE I: Acurate NEO vs Sapien 3, no non-inferiority at one year?


The device-oriented endpoint was less frequent for durable-polymer DES: 2.6% vs. 3.9% for biodegradable-polymer DES.

This difference was based on less target-lesion revascularization with durable-polymer DES. This new technology reached non-inferiority for this device-oriented composite endpoint.

Spontaneous infarction or stent thrombosis rates were extremely low in both arms, and there were no significant differences between them (0.6% vs. 0.8%; p = 0.513 and 0.1% vs. 0.4%; p = 0.174, respectively).

Conclusion

Biodegradable-polymer DES reached non-inferiority vs. durable-polymer DES in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

This was true for the composite patient-oriented endpoint, but not for the composite device-oriented endpoint: biodegradable-polymer DES was associated with more target-lesion revascularizations.

CIRCULATIONAHA.120.051700

Original Title: Durable Polymer Versus Biodegradable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome. The HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS Trial.

Reference: Hyo-Soo Kim et al. Circulation. 2021;143:1081–1091. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.051700.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....