More Screening Needed Before Non-Cardiac Surgery

According to this recent document by the American Heart Association (AHA), troponin should be monitored for at least 3 days after surgery.

Más screening es necesario previo a una cirugía cardíaca

With about 20% of patients (most of them, asymptomatic) showing elevated troponin after a non-cardiac surgery, this new AHA document recommends monitoring, for at least two days, patients with moderate to severe ischemia.

Myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery was first associated with increased mortality in 2014. At the time, researchers interpreted that these events could be triggered by an increased burden of risk factors, including patients over 75 years of age with sleep apnea, anemia, cardiac failure, diabetes, and hypertension.

The moral of this work would be that myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery is frequent, silent, and fatal—so it should be taken into account.

Current evidence shows that patients who develop injury have four times higher 30-day mortality, and about 90% of this population has no identifiable symptoms.

Given that most subjects develop symptoms within 24 hours, the document suggests dosing troponins for 48 to 72 hours in patients at moderately high risk.


Read also: Hypertensive Patients: Maximizing Doses or Adding New Drugs.


The idea of performing ischemia-evoking tests prior to non-cardiac surgery left us without much to do if a patient with normal results developed an injury. Now we can comprehend the elevation and re-stratify patients, reducing their future risk.

Post-surgical injury should end in a direct referral to a cardiologist to evaluate the indication for aspirin and lifestyle changes. Patient could interpret this as secondary prevention.

CIR-0000000000001024

Original Title: Diagnosis and management of patients with myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

Reference: Kurt Ruetzler et al. Circulation. 2021 Oct 4;CIR0000000000001024. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001024. 


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...