ACC 2022 | ADAPT-TAVR: Endoxaban Is Not Superior to DAPT After TAVR

DAPT-TAVR is a randomized trial that tested endoxaban in patients with no indication for anticoagulation who underwent successful transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis.

ACC 2022 | ADAPT-TAVR: Endoxaban No Better Than DAPT After TAVI

This study included 229 patients whose mean age was 80 years; 42% of them were male. Patients were randomized to either endoxaban 60 mg or 30 mg every 24 h or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT, aspirin plus clopidogrel).

Low dosage was used in 61.3% of patients because they met one of the following criteria: moderate to severe function impairment, low weight, or concomitant use of P-glycoprotein inhibitors. After 6 months, they were tested by means of 4-dimensional angioTAC, neurological and cognitive assessment, and brain MRI.

Populations were similar, with no difference in characteristics between groups, and 90% received a balloon-expandable valve. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score was 3.3%.

After 6 months of follow-up, endoxaban failed to show a significant difference in fewer leafleat thrombosis in the intent-to-treat arm, but there was a difference in patients with high DOAC compliance (9.1% vs. 19.1%; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-0.99).

Read also: ACC 2022 | BENTRACIMAB.

There were no differences in the secondary endpoints, which included leaflet mobility reduction ≥3; presence, number and volume of new brain lesions in the MRI; and neurological changes.

Leaflet hypoattenuation was not linked to new brain lesions, neurological disorders, or cognitive disfunction.

Furthermore, there were no differences in the safety endpoints, which included death, stroke, systemic thromboembolism, or bleeding vs. DAPT (11.7% vs. 12.7%; HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.44-1.96).

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org .


Suscríbase a nuestro newsletter semanal

Reciba resúmenes con los últimos artículos científicos

More articles by this author

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Transradial Aortic Valvuloplasty: Is Minimalism Worth It?

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has historically been used either as a bridge strategy, an assessment tool, or even palliative treatment in severe aortic stenosis...

Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Cohort Study with Continuous Implantable Cardiac Monitoring

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a recognized complication following percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO), with reported incidences of up to 30% during...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....