Are FFR and IVUS Similar to Assess Intermediate Lesions?

In coronary artery disease (CAD), lumen area and plaque burden, characteristics and physiological impact are what define prognosis. 

¿El FFR y el IVUS son similares para evaluar las lesiones intermedias?

At present, coronary angiography continues to be the gold standard for CAD assessment. 

When considering PCI to treat intermediate lesions, FFR has been shown beneficial and safe. Not yet IVUS.

1682 patients with intermediate lesions (40 – 70% occlusion) in 2.5 mm vessels by visual estimation to be assessed with FFR or IVUS. 838 of these vessels were assessed with FFR (49.8%) and 844 with IVUS (50.2%).

Primary end point was a composite of all cause death, myocardial infarction and/or revascularization within 24 months after randomization. 

Mean age was 65, mostly men, 33% diabetic, 17% had kidney function deterioration, 6% prior MI, 20% PCI. Ejection fraction was 63%.

Read also: Gender Differences and 10-Year Prognosis in STEMI.

63% presented stable heart disease, 30% acute coronary syndrome, 1.6% NSTEMI and 0.5% STEMI.

The artery most frequently affected was the anterior descending (61%), 47% of patients presented only one vessel, and 32% two vessels. There were no differences in vessel diameter, lesion obstruction or length. 

In patients who underwent IVUS there were more angioplasty procedures (65.3% vs. 44.4%). 

Primary end point at 24 months was similar for both strategies (8.1% vs. 8.5% P=0.01 for non-inferiority)

Read also: Is TCA Useful for Severe Impairment of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction?

Neither were there differences in all-cause mortality (4.6% vs. 3.4%), MI (1.9% vs. 1.7%), revascularization (5.7% vs. 5.3%) or stroke (0.7% vs. 1.2%) for FFR or IVUS respectively.

Conclusion

In patients with intermediate lesions assessed for PCI, FFR was non inferior to IVUS as regards primary end point evolution, the composite of death, MI or revascularization, at 24 months. 

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Fractional Flow Reserve or Intravascular Ultrasonography to Guide PCI. For the FLAVOUR Investigators. 

Reference: B.-K. Koo, et al. N Engl J Med 2022;387:779-89. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2201546.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

ROLLER COASTR-EPIC22: Comparison of Plaque Modification Techniques in Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions

The presence of coronary calcium significantly limits the success of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), primarily due to suboptimal stent expansion. This can lead to...

Early and Late Outcomes with the ABSORB Bioresorbable Scaffold

Coronary angioplasty with drug-eluting stents (DES) is associated with a 2-3% annual incidence of stent-related events, a risk that has not significantly decreased despite...

Is Angioplasty Always Necessary after TAVR?

Courtesy of: Silvina E. Gomez, MD The prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients undergoing TAVR is high, ranging from 40 to 70%, according...

Provisional Stenting vs. Two-Stent Technique in Non-Complex Left Main Disease: Three-Year Follow-Up of the EBC-Main Study

In left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease, for lesions of low to intermediate complexity according to the SYNTAX score, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TAVR in Bicuspid Valves: Higher Prosthesis Mismatch?

TAVR indication is steadily advancing onto younger, lower risk patients.  The presence of bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) has been observed in 0.5% to 2% of...

ROLLER COASTR-EPIC22: Comparison of Plaque Modification Techniques in Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions

The presence of coronary calcium significantly limits the success of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), primarily due to suboptimal stent expansion. This can lead to...

Edge-to-Edge Repair in Central and Non-Central Mitral Regurgitation

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common condition, with approximately 3.5% prevalence in individuals under 65, increasing to 7.7% in those over 75. It can...