Prosthesis Mismatch in TAVR: It’s Real Impact

Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) was initially proposed by Rahimtoola and reintroduced by Pirabot.

La prudencia es buena consejera para decidir una transfusión en el TAVI

PPM is the indexed effective orifice area in relation to body surface area, cutoff value being 0.85 cm2/m2, and <0.70 cm2/m2for obese patients. PPM is considered moderate if indexed effective orifice area is 0.65-0.85 cm2/m2 and severe when <0.65 cm2/m2 

Research studies on surgical prosthesis have associated PPM with higher mortality at short, mid and long term. 

There are few studies on post TAVR PPM. Unlike surgical prosthesis, its impact remains to be shown. 

The current study is a meta-analysis of 23 studies with a total 81969 patients. 19612 presented some degree of PPM (23.9%).

Mortality was higher in patients presenting moderate/severe PPM (HR: 1.09 [95% CI: 1.04-1.14]; P < 0.001).

Within the first 30 months, mortality was higher in patients with moderate to severe PPM (HR: 1.1 [95% CI: 1.05-1.16]; P < 0.001). After 30 days, even though mortality was slightly higher, it did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.83 [95% CI: 0.68-1.01]; P = 0.064).

Read also: AQCA Study: Pre-PCI Virtual QFR for Planning PCI vs. Conventional Angiography.

Additionally, PPM moderate and severe were looked at separately, resulting in higher mortality the with more severe PPM, vs. patients with no PPM (HR: 1.25 [95% CI: 1.16-1.36]; P < 0.001). However, this was not the case when looking at moderate PPM (HR: 1.03 [95% CI: 0.96-1.10]; P = 0.398). 

Conclusion

Severe PPM was associated to higher mortality at TAVR followup (unlike moderate PPM). These outcomes call for strategies to prevent severe PPM. 

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Meta-Analysis of Kaplan-Meier–Derived Individual Patient Data.

Reference: Michel Pompeu Sá, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2023;16:298–310.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Transradial Aortic Valvuloplasty: Is Minimalism Worth It?

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has historically been used either as a bridge strategy, an assessment tool, or even palliative treatment in severe aortic stenosis...

Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Cohort Study with Continuous Implantable Cardiac Monitoring

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a recognized complication following percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO), with reported incidences of up to 30% during...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....