Use of OCT in Calcified Lesions: Results from a Subanalysis of ILUMIEN IV

Coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), as it is associated with suboptimal stent expansion, higher complication rates, and an increased risk of long-term adverse events. Intracoronary imaging, particularly optical coherence tomography (OCT), enables accurate calcium quantification, facilitates adequate lesion preparation, and optimizes stent implantation.

In this prespecified subanalysis of ILUMIEN IV, the impact of OCT guidance versus conventional angiography was assessed in patients with moderately or severely calcified coronary lesions.

A total of 1,082 patients from the main trial with single treated lesions and moderate/severe calcification confirmed by a core lab were included. The OCT-guided strategy was compared with angiography guidance, with the primary clinical endpoint (PCE) being target vessel failure (TVF) at 2 years —a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization. The primary imaging endpoint was post-PCI minimum stent area (MSA).

OCT-guided PCI was associated with a larger post-procedure MSA (5.57 ± 1.86 vs. 5.33 ± 1.78 mm²; p=0.03) and better stent expansion. It also showed lower rates of edge dissection, significant malapposition, and focal residual disease in reference segments.

Read also: Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients with Positive Coronary CT Angiography: Implications of Invasive Physiological Studies.

Clinically, the OCT-guided strategy significantly reduced 2-year events: lower TVF (6.8% vs. 9.7%; adjHR 0.62; 95%CI: 0.40–0.96; p=0.03), fewer serious MACE (2.8% vs. 4.7%; adjHR 0.49; p=0.03), reduced target vessel myocardial infarction (1.9% vs. 4.0%; adjHR 0.36; p=0.01), and fewer stent thromboses (0.2% vs. 1.5%; adjHR 0.11; p=0.04). A significant reduction in serious adverse events at 30 days was also observed.

Conclusions

In patients with angiographically relevant coronary calcification, OCT-guided PCI demonstrated sustained 2-year clinical benefits, attributable to better lesion preparation and stent optimization. These findings support the use of OCT in this complex patient subgroup.

Original Title: Optical coherence tomography- vs angiography-guided coronary stent implantation in calcified lesions: the ILUMIEN IV trial.

Reference: Ali ZA, Shin D, Vijayvergiya R, Gawalkar AA, Shlofmitz RA, Alfonso F, Calligaris G, Canova P, Sakai K, Price MJ, Leistner D, Prati F, Mintz G, Matsumura M, McGreevy RJ, McNutt RW, Nie H, Buccola J, Landmesser U, Maehara A, Stone GW. Optical coherence tomography- vs angiography-guided coronary stent implantation in calcified lesions: the ILUMIEN IV trial. Eur Heart J. 2025 Aug 21;46(32):3201-3210. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf331. PMID: 40470719; PMCID: PMC12369818.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

Comparison of strategies: NMA of IVUS, OCT, or angiography in complex lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions continues to represent a technical challenge in contemporary interventional cardiology. Angiography, although it remains the most widely...

Dynamic Coronary Roadmap: does it really help reduce contrast use?

Contrast-induced nephropathy remains a relevant complication of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), particularly in patients with multiple comorbidities and complex coronary anatomies. Dynamic Coronary Roadmap...

Long-Term Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With ANOCA: A Clinical Reality to Consider?

Chronic stable angina (CSA) remains one of the most frequent reasons for referral to diagnostic coronary angiography (CAG). In a substantial proportion of these...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

VECTOR: First Percutaneous Aorto-Coronary Bypass Case, a New Conceptual Approach

Coronary obstruction represents one of the most severe complications associated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation, particularly in valve-in-valve scenarios involving surgical bioprostheses, narrow aortic...

Comparison of strategies: NMA of IVUS, OCT, or angiography in complex lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions continues to represent a technical challenge in contemporary interventional cardiology. Angiography, although it remains the most widely...